please review:
way 253651981,way 115687344
I guess it should be
highway=residential
but what about the surface ?

please review:
I've just corrected a wrong tag
for way 119401978

please review:
way 13049868 looks wrong,
highway=primary + surface=grass?

please review :
way 365002632
has invalid tags:
highway=residential;unclassified
tiger:county=Utah, UT;Wasatch, UT

bitte beachten:
highway=residential;unclassified
ist ungültig. Habe es gerade geändert.

please review this and many more changesets in this area:
tags with prefix addr: should not be used
for highways, please use the corresponding
tags with prefix is_in:

please review:
I've corrected a wrong tag on way 138410286:
highway=residential;unclassified
to
highway=residential
I've also added some more roads,
maybe you know the names for them?
See osm.org/changeset/34669313

nicht einverstanden?
Im Moment fehlt der Weg einfach auf der Karte, weil
highway=service;residential
keinen Sinn ergibt.

please review:
way 123158137 (name=Якорный проспект)
has now invalid tag
highway=residential;tertiary
and disappeared from the map

bitte prüfen:
highway=residential;tertiary
ist ungültig.
name=Obersammelsdorf...Lanzendorf
sieht auch seltsam aus.
Evtl. sind alle Strassen mit diesem
Namen highway=tertiary?

I've corrected a few invalid tags like
highway=residential;road

If you are a local, please review
osm.org/changeset/34668639

please review:
footway=ebankment
is a very unusual tag. Was ist
meant to be embankment=yes ?

please review:
highway=footway
footway=footway
looks wrong. Are these ways only
for pedestrians or also for cyclists?

please review: invalid tags for
way 32269418:
highway=residential;tertiary
surface=paved;unpaved

please review:
way 107885451 has invalid tags
highway=track;residential
surface=earth;cobblestone
Maybe split the way where the surface changes

please review:
way 125098394 (Rua Marfim) doesn't appear on the map
because it has the invalid tag
highway=residential;track

please review:
way 124168720 has invalid tag:
highway=residential;track
Also suspicious:
yh:WIDTH=1.5m〜3.0m;3.0m〜5.5m

please review:
way 43533380 now has invalid tags
highway=residential;track
surface=paved;ground;unpaved

you missed two small pieces

please review:
some ways don't appear on the map because they have the wrong tag
highway=unclassified;track