Hi and welcome to OSM!
You mapped some proposed objects here. The normal tagging scheme for a proposed service road is : highway=proposed + proposed=service
For amenities, the prefix proposed is used, e.g. proposed:amenity=parking
See also osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

You seem to import data here and the quality looks very poor. It seems you did not read the corresponding guidelines:
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
Please stop these imports for now, as it is likely that your edits are reverted.

Hi! Something seems to have gone wrong here, I see lots of unconnected nodes without any tags.

Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please check osm.org/way/90194680
The ref was CW 80, which looks reasonable.
You added name=BOULEVARD 01 NOVEMBRE and also changed the ref to this value. I've revierted the change to the ref and changed the name to mixed case "Boulevard 01 Novembre"

Does anybody know the current status of this way: osm.org/way/230135072 ?

Hmm, disused:highway=removed is still unusual. I think the idea of those prefixes is that you use the standard highway values. So, if the removed way was a highway=footway, the new value would be removed:highway=footway.

Hi! Please review invalid tag highway="path; track" on way osm.org/way/626415632.
I assume you wanted to change track to path? I wonder how the remaining short hw=track can be used when only connected to hw=path.

Hi! Please check:
I've noticed a few ways in this area with highway=passing_place.
I guess you meant path instead? In case of osm.org/way/571570144 I'd say it is a hw=service,
the other two near osm.org/way/591546123 are not clearly shown on sat images. The position of the buildings in this area doesn't nearly match the sat images. Why?

Moin!
Was bedeuted denn ein highway=passing_place an einem Weg wie diesem: osm.org/way/616165640 oder diesem osm.org/way/616771802 ?

Hi!
I've noticed that you map highway=passing_place as a way in addition to the normal way as a single node here.
I wonder why. I also don't understand why those places have a name, I think that's unlikely.

Hi! Please check:
What does highway=no mean on this way:
osm.org/way/85550573 ?
Just a typo?

Hi! Please review way osm.org/way/550941097
with suspicous tag highway=passing_place. Sat images don't show a way, so it seems that this is a shortcut? Maybe use highway=path and trail_visibility=no
See osm.wiki/Key:trail_visibility.

Hi!
Please review two ways with suspicous highway=passing_place: osm.org/way/599743162
osm.org/way/599743169
I assume these are also natural=tree_row
like e.g. osm.org/way/599743178 ?

Hi! I've noticed a lot of small areas with
natural=wood here. It seems that each one represents one tree. I think you should use a single node with natural=tree for this.

Hi!
You used the very unusual tag highway=minor for this road:
osm.org/way/13515159
Why not unclassified?

Hi! Please review way osm.org/way/623158862
The tag highway=minor is very unusual, it should probably be changed to unclassified.
I don't understand why it ends at node
osm.org/node/5885314064. It seems to continue on the old railway way named Ferrocarril de Girardot?

Hi!
This change modified a few ways with the strange tag highway=living_street;service, and service=driveway, e.g. this one:
osm.org/way/555194512
Your comment says that you only wanted to add the name, so I removed the other changes. Please check:
osm.org/changeset/63053872

OK, but highway=bus is still only used here. I think it is either service or residential.

Hi and welcome to OSM!
What did you try to map here?

Hi!
I've tried to fix a typo here:
osm.org/changeset/63031999
Hope I got it right?