please review:
I guess you meant highway=footway here.
It should probably be combined with way 32056568 (which has no tags so far) and
way 4719329.

please review ways 371867114 and 371867112:
The tag highway=footpath is rarely used,
it could be path or footway. In any case,
please specify bicycle access (yes/no) as well.

Bitte prüfen:
highway=footpath is ungewöhnlich,
es passt entweder highway=path oder highway=footway
way 366472070,node 3704494525,way 366472072
Bitte auch angeben, ob Radeln erlaubt ist.
Der Weg dazwischen (way 366472071) hat gar keine Tags.

please review: highway=footpath
is unusual, use either path or footway.

Bitte prüfen:
highway=footpath ist ungewöhnlich.
Bitte path oder footway verwenden.
Gibt es da sonst keinen Weg zwischen
den Brücken? Gilt evtl. bicycle=yes ?

please review : The tag highway=footway
is rarely used, I assume you meant highway=path ? Or highway=footway?
In both cases, please specify access for bicycle.

please review way 25458301:
The tag highway=footpath is rarely used.
I think it should highway=path, maybe
with bicycle=no.
I also guess that there is some barrier=*
near the junction to way 372583176 ?
If yes, please add that because it would
explain why a highway=secondary ends as a path.

please review:
highway=footpath is rarely used,
if I got the history right it should be tagged
highway=pedestrian,bicycle=no

please review:
osm.org/way/83641000
I've changed highway=lane to highway=footway, the tag highway=lane should not be used
I used footway because it ends at another footway, but it looks more like a highway=unclassified to me.

okay, thanks for the feedback

The problem: highway=truck is rarely used.
It looks like highway=track, but the road is not a track, In fact I don't see a road in Bing.
I am talking about this way;
osm.org/way/366845287

fine, thanks for the feedback

okay, thanks for the feedback

please review: I found several ways
tagged highway=ser
I've changed them to highway=service
when unnamed , else highway=residential

osm.org/changeset/34901544
osm.org/changeset/34901599
osm.org/changeset/34901655

okay, thanks for the feedback

way 375397791 is tagged
area=yes
highway=residentials
which is rarely used.
Looks like amenity=parking

please review

please review
the way was tagged
highway=secondary;tertiary
I've changed it to
highway=secondary
Maybe it should be
highway=tertiary?

please review way 256373289:
I've changed the rarely used tag highway=future_residential
to highway:future=residential
to match the other roads.
The normal tag would be highway=proposed, but I also like highway:future.
See also
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/how-to-tag-a-highway-that-doesn-t-exist-tp5857111.html

This change produced some invalid highway tags like
highway=living_street;residential
or highway=residential;living_street
This is a common problem with iD,
so please take care.
You should review my changes here:
osm.org/changeset/34899821