Hi again! I fixed another typo
highway=residenta on
osm.org/way/202073668

Hi! Please watch out for typo highway=residental (missing 2nd i)
Fixed it here:
osm.org/way/635801906
osm.org/way/227120145

Reg. the positions: Aerial images may be shifted, make sure to adjust the position.
See osm.wiki/Using_Imagery

Forgot to say that the correct tag would be railway=level_crossing in case there is no bridge...

Hi!
Are you sure that there is no bridge at this point?
osm.org/node/4919299964
E.g. ESRI sat image seems to show a bridge with a truck on it.

I removed this node, see my changes:
osm.org/changeset/63670169

Hi! Please review this place:
osm.org/node/5987640316
Sat images show a rail on a bridge, not a level_crossing

Hallo Lokalfürst,

der Weg war vorher auch highway=path,
nie footway. Nach Deinen Hinweisen sollte wohl noch ein surface=ground dran. Ist der Weg osm.org/way/43785407
wirklich ein Weg mit Sand als Oberfläche?
Und trotzdem bicycle=designated ?
Oder ist das eher fine_gravel?

Hi again!
You moved the nodes of the primary road, e.g. here:
osm.org/node/4391674976
Was that intended? The GPS traces stored in OSM seem to show that the ways are now too far from each other.
The ways should be placed in the middle of the road, in case of osm.org/way/24818619 that means the middle of the 2nd lane. The current position seems to be that of the sidewalks.
The problem is that the map says these roads are crossing many buildings which probably isn't true.

The sidewalk tags look OK, but I can't say if the whole stretch of the road has a sidewalk.
The bridge still was not OK. Please check my changes:
osm.org/changeset/63668975

I don't see a change. Did you save already?

Thanks, looks more plausibe now :-)

First see osm.wiki/Key:sidewalk
There are two ways to map a sidewalk:
1) add the tag sidewalk to the existing road. Maybe split the road if only a part of it has a sidewalk.
2) add a new way with highway=footway, footway=sidewalk and make sure that it is connected to the road network.
Option 2) is typically more complex and often leads to routing errors for pedestrians.
I have no idea how to do that with Go Map! or iD. Do you know the editor JOSM?

See my cs:
osm.org/changeset/63668220

Hi! I've just corrected a typo at the roundabout area here:
osm.org/changeset/63668082
and noticed the way osm.org/way/444907458
You seem to be a local, do you know which ways are tunnels / bridges? Maybe you can add that information?

I don't sugest to use constuction:highway, the tag highway=construction is well established.
In case of roads which do no longer exist the tag highway=disused is simply wrong, in the past highway=razed was used for that, now it should be razed:highway=*
If you use OSM as part of your GIS you still should try to contribute in a way that is acepted by the community.

OK, I've restored the route relations here:
osm.org/changeset/63643711

OK, I am trying to fix this. The river is already restored...

Hab es wieder auf path zurückgeändert.
Wäre nett, wenn Du mal auf CS Kommentare oder posts reagieren würdest.

Moin! Schau bitte noch mal auf den Weg osm.org/way/635440976
Ist mir wegen highway=p aufgefallen,sollte wohl eigentlich ein geschlossener Weg mit highway=pedestrian sein?