OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
64436683 almost 7 years ago

Hi! I've corrected the typo highway=sevice here:
osm.org/changeset/64475173
DigitalGlobe Premium Imagery shows connections osm.org/way/508120219
Why didn't you map it that way?

64451102 almost 7 years ago

Hi! What does highway=model mean?
The bridge is tagged highway=raceway, so I guess this should be used for the whole way?
osm.org/way/643888711

64373751 almost 7 years ago

Oops, forgot a link:
osm.org/way/643087705

64373751 almost 7 years ago

Hi!
You created some ways with the unusual highway=driveway instead of highway=service + service=driveway.
Was that intended?

64400414 almost 7 years ago

Hi!
Your change created a lot of duplicated nodes in osm.org/way/643344602
Similar problem here:
osm.org/way/643369000
Did you disable the corresponding warning in JOSM?

64184987 almost 7 years ago

I knew this project. From your comment I got the idea that you visited the place, so the source would be survey and not aerial image.

64332580 almost 7 years ago

I think you should also remove the out-aged highway=ford key unless you know an app which still doesn't know ford=yes.

15521467 almost 7 years ago

Hi! Would be good if ways like this would be connected to the road network:
osm.org/way/213232382. Why didn't you do that?

56524695 almost 7 years ago

Seems nobody feels responsible here?
There is a highway=track connected to the motorway:
osm.org/way/57745100
There is the typo highway=primary_link;abandoned on osm.org/way/230135072

51992029 almost 7 years ago

Hat sich noch leider nichts geändert.

64320733 almost 7 years ago

Hi!
Please check typo
highway=unclassified; service on
osm.org/way/642537041
Besides the wrong highway tag I am not sure what you wanted to do here. The highway is now a oneway and connected to a power line.

62612904 almost 7 years ago

Hi! What is meant with highway=truck?
Was it a typo?
osm.org/way/625763303

64332580 almost 7 years ago

Hi!
Please use ford=yes to map fords. See osm.wiki/Key:ford

64167000 almost 7 years ago

Thanks for the links. I've changed the tag to highway=pedestrian. I don't know yet whether to split the building or the pedestrian area. I think the building some kind of bridge here. I'll try to find out...

38900244 almost 7 years ago

Hi! Maybe this is a shoal ? osm.wiki/Tag:natural%3Dshoal

64295852 almost 7 years ago

Hi!
The tag highway=turning_loop is for nodes, not for ways. There are now to objects for the loop.
The node tagged as turning_circle should be changed to that and its location should be close to the tree. In that case the way should be removed.
Alternative is to remove the tag from the node, keep the way and change it to residential.
See also osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_loop

64288565 almost 7 years ago

Hi!
I think none of the ways here is a highway=bus_guideway. They are very special, see osm.wiki/Tag:highway=bus_guideway

64303326 almost 7 years ago

Welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this changeset because of this way:
osm.org/way/375921541
It seems you have connected a highway with a waterway. Most of the old way was tagged highway=unclassified, that seems correct. If I got that right there is a waterway next to the road. Please draw a new way for that and unglue the waterways from the highway. What did you mean with highway=bus? That is very unusual.
Your goal should be to connect waterways so that they form a network.
Draw the way in the direction of the water flow.
Don't connect waterways and roads, they form separated networks.
Use Shift+V to run the validator, check the messages, they often help.
Hope this helps?

64255431 almost 7 years ago

Hi!
Please explain where you got this strange data with lots of null values, e.g. amenity=null
barrier=null
brand=null
osm.org/way/641881011
This looks like a bad import to me, was it discussed somewhere? See also
osm.org/changeset/64262561

58759851 almost 7 years ago

Hi!
I try to understand why you created a new route=pipeline relation here.
osm.org/relation/8279171
Most of it repeats the information of the much older route relation osm.org/relation/8279171
There is also one way that doesn't seem to be part of it:
osm.org/way/123724670