I've noticed this changeset because of a common typo in more than 26000 nodes:
leaf_type=broadl-leaved
instead of
leaf_type=broadleaved
Why wasn't this cs reverted?

Hi! It seems that iD is not a good choice to do this work. You have messed up a lot of multipolygon relations in this area. Maybe try JOSM instead, it has much better tools to help with that.

Hi!
I see that you map sidewalks like osm.org/way/633001563
as separate ways instead of simply
adding the sidewalk tag to the major road. Maybe you did not know that option?
osm.wiki/Key:sidewalk

Hm, mit dieser Änderung hast Du an osm.org/node/5409796636
jetzt vier TR, aber keine von osm.org/way/652010910 nach osm.org/way/570691568
Also zwei zuviel und eine andere zuwenig ;)

Hi uvi,
darf man hier nicht links oder nicht rechts rum?
osm.org/node/5409796637#map=19/50.82107/13.07499

You can search for an id in JOSM using
id: as prefix, e.g. id:646044410

Ich habe den Weg mal dort gezeichnet, wo ich ihn auf Bing sehe und wieder mit dem originalen Track verbunden. Bing ist hier etwas versetzt, zeigt aber den Weg sehr gut.
Habe dabei dummerweise zuerst die Historie des alten Wegs vernichtet, aber jetzt sollte es passen.
Ansonsten: Wenn man etwas auf einer Luftaufnahme nicht sieht bedeutet das nicht, dass es falsch ist.
Bitte in Zukunft erst mal die anderen Luftaufnahmen anschauen und dann evtl. entweder den Mapper kontaktieren oder ein fixme dranhängen. Luftaufnahmen sind ja auch nie lagegenau und können in den Bergen auch sehr verzerrt sein.
Siehe auch osm.wiki/DE:Luftbilder_verwenden

JOSM produces a warning for untagged ways. If you don't see that warning you may have pressed the ignore button. You can reset these settings when you remove the file %AppData%\\JOSM\validator\ignorederrors

In many countries highway=track also means access=agricultural. You may use smoothness=*, see osm.wiki/Key:smoothness

Why didn't you improve the position?

Oops, forgot a link to an example:
osm.org/way/646077758

Hi!
You mapped a few ways with highway=sidewalk here. The normal tagging would be highway=footway + footway=sidewalk, but I think there is no need to map those sidewalks with separate ways. You can use the sidewalk tag, see osm.wiki/Key:sidewalk

Hi! I've noticed this changeset because of the unusual tag highway=ruins. Did you mean historic=ruins?

Hi! Please check typo highway=p
osm.org/way/646095039
I don't see a highway there.

Hallo!
Was ist mit highway=access gemeint?
Für mich sieht das nach einem highway=service aus.
osm.org/way/151176163

I tried to correct it here:
osm.org/changeset/64622026
Please review.

Hi!
You created some ways without tags here, they looks like residential roads to me.
There are some roads with highway=track, did you use that because they are unpaved? If they are residential roads you should use surface=unpaved or similar to map that.
There is also one with highway=trackr
which is not yet connected to the road network.
osm.org/way/645263966
Please try to correct this.

Hi! Why did you change a part of the track to highway=guessed_track?
Bing shows a way close to the way, so I wonder what to do.
osm.org/way/645428209

Hi!
You use highway=barrier here, a very unusual tag. I think what you meant is a kerb? See osm.wiki/Key:kerb
One of the ways is here:
osm.org/way/645143414

OK, seems I did not find the right words, so I've now corrected the other error:
osm.org/changeset/64565746