Glassman's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
159724186 | 9 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
159724142 | 9 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
|
159673529 | 9 months ago | #TIP: we don't use descriptive names in OSM. Just tag the feature. For example, building=yes or if you know the type of building you can tag it as building=house. For the water treatment feature I'm guessing it is a clarifier which is tagged as man_made=clarifier. See osm.wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dclarifier. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
|
159667769 | 9 months ago | You can easily create a multipolygon just by selecting the smaller feature inside of the woods + the woods then just right click and select the + icon to create a multipolygon. This will create a more accurate set of features. I'm happy to help - just let me know. |
159585779 | 9 months ago | I have so many edits, and I keep making mistakes so it's not a big deal. To remove just the business, use the remove icon next to the non existent features in the list of tags towards the bottom left hand side of the editor. Or even easier, right click on the node or polygon the select the ⋁ to remove all but the address tags. |
159597763 | 9 months ago | #TIP: we spell out street names in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating.
|
159597900 | 9 months ago | It looks like you acidentally changed a landuse to a stream. Can you change it back to land use. The new stream you added looks great, you even added the culvert.
|
159585779 | 9 months ago | #TIP: in the future just remove the business and not the address. The address will likely be reused by another shop.
|
159576483 | 9 months ago | Thanks for adding the bridge support. You might also want to move the abandoned railway to match the imagery and added the bridge. Also, leaving good changeset comments is helpful to you and others. See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments FYI - your user name caught my attention. Google doesn't allow copying their data. Even from imagery.
|
159561599 | 9 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. You might want to check the boundaries for the park. The county shows a larger area. See https://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/iMap/
|
159556836 | 9 months ago | #TIP: the value for the colour= tag should be all lower case. Also the reference tag is typically a numeric value. See osm.wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant for a whole lot of options. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
|
159555303 | 9 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
159521272 | 9 months ago | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
|
159521287 | 9 months ago | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
|
159521272 | 9 months ago | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
|
159521272 | 9 months ago | DWG - Google does not allow use of their maps for improving OSM. Please do not do so in the future. The 3 changesets that have google as a source will be redacted. See osm.wiki/Google for more information.
|
159445645 | 9 months ago | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. I'm reverting this changeset. Please do not vandalize OSM.
|
159438028 | 9 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. The building looks good, but I'm not sure what exactly you did with the roundabout. Can you explain?
|
159437948 | 9 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
159437426 | 9 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|