OpenStreetMap
This is a quick count of the various editors used by mappers in 2020. iD is on top with 7.6M edits followed by JOSM with 5.6M. The data was collected by looking at tags->created_by in the changeset database.
| Editor | Count |
|---|---|
| iD | 7636890 |
| JOSM | 5644149 |
| StreetComplete | 414353 |
| MAPS.ME | 160365 |
| Go Map!! | 122639 |
| OsmAnd | 118465 |
| Potlatch | 115427 |
| Vespucci | 100327 |
| Other | 90879 |
| osmapi | 73587 |
| Refill Südtirol | 22612 |
| Services_OpenStreetMap | 16985 |
| Merkaartor | 13137 |
| autoAWS | 11626 |
| All the Things | 10548 |
| caresteouvert.fr | 7930 |
| Go Kaart!! | 7567 |
| FireYak | 6956 |
| OsmHydrant | 6564 |
| MapRoulette | 3206 |
| ArcGIS Editor for OpenStreetMap | 2611 |
| Rosemary | 2067 |
| Gnome Maps | 1437 |
Diskussion
Kommentar von jimkats am 9. November 2020 um 01:07 Uhr
Those are interesting stats. Thanks for sharing the cumulation.
I see JOSM is used as massively as iD.
Kommentar von SimonPoole am 9. November 2020 um 09:51 Uhr
There are regularly updated statistics on editor usage avaliable here osm.wiki/Editor_usage_stats
It seems as if you are actually using changeset counts and not edits as you claim, this is not only extremely mislieading and distorts actual use of the various apps, changeset counts are simply not a good metric for anything.
Kommentar von SomeoneElse am 9. November 2020 um 13:11 Uhr
It’d be interesting to link to the sites / editors behind these. I’m surprised to see a local site for one purpose “Refill Südtirol” so high up the list, for example.
Kommentar von SimonPoole am 9. November 2020 um 13:26 Uhr
@SomeoneElse I was actually prompted to have a quick look at the empty changeset numbers, and they have doubled from the usual ~5’000/month since August and the “Refill Südtirol” app is the major culprit (for the increase, the rest are the usual suspects JOSM, maps.me and id).
Generating a list of user ids as I write.
Kommentar von SimonPoole am 9. November 2020 um 13:33 Uhr
@SomeoneElse see for example osm.org/user/danielbir with > 6000 empty changesets.
Kommentar von SimonPoole am 9. November 2020 um 13:34 Uhr
And this is the app https://www.refill.bz.it/?mz=9&mc=46.640008243515915,11.351623535156252 looks harmless, probably just buggy.
Kommentar von SomeoneElse am 9. November 2020 um 15:32 Uhr
Thanks - we (the DWG) occasionally get complaints about people trying to “game” editing statistics (by e.g. editing the same thing over and over again) but I don’t remember any about empty changesets.