However, in the process you have disconnected service streets. Please, make more accurate edits

Thank you for updating Saryan street!

Hi!
In this changeset I spotted you added garbage dumpsters.
The convention of OSM regarding amenities (unlike trees) is not to map every object, but to map one place that serves as certain amenity as one.
E.g. on Parpetzi near Tumanyan, there should be only one point of mixed garbage collection.
However, currently there are 3 separate points of separate waste collection... because of pitfalls of import. (They should be merged eventually form 3-2 points of red/blue/yellow/glass containers into 1)

Hi! In this set you deleted trees and replaced them with a tree line.

This edit leads to loss of information.
Please, revert this and other similar changes, that erase visibility of facts.

Kind regards,
Gregory M.

"Memorial" tag is always "historic" (from wiki), so I suppose it is optional/implied. Nevertheless, I have added it to the original object

This is a duplicate of already existing object on this place => please, revert this changeset

Only now have I seen this comment. Sorry for missing the message. I see things got ironed out since then

Mateusz, thanks for noticing!
It is a typo -> I have already corrected and changed it for Paving Stones.

Всё понял, но не хватает времени исправить.

Жаль, что не принято рисовать тротуары, ведь это часть качества навигации: по дорогам, хоть, формально, и предписано преимущество пешеходов, людям не комфортно идти на пути машин, а иногда и невозможно (когда лужи и снеговая жижа) - поэтому проработанная сеть тротуаров была бы полезна для навигации (например, так используют ОСМ в Германии для проверки проходимости маршрута для людей с ограниченной мобильностью)

This street name is not real: small griefing / self-advertising

osm.org/changeset/161814330

ПС: Хин Ереванци к востоку от Северного проспекта, возможно, тоже достоит статуса третичности, если по нему много проезжает транзитного потока, но я в этом меньше уверен - надо обратить внимание

Кусок, что между Северным проспектом и Кохбаци - интенстивно используется как транзитный, а не для доступа к домам (гораздо больше through, чем residents). А остальным кусочки, кажется, не менял,оставил residential: там, действительно, либо просто очень мало трафика, либо он для доступа к домам

Hi!
I see you have created a "tourist attraction" ner the stairs in Nor Norq 8. Can you, please, explain how it is an attraction?

Thanks! And am sorry for my confusing questions and request. For a long time I did not realise your edit was not a mass edit, but the reversal of mass edits. And I was not familiar with DWG abbreviation as well.

I cannot (do not know how!) get the subset of changes for a particular area.

And, again, thanks for your work reverting mass changes!)

First, thank you for your prompt reply! I agree with your classification for absolute majority of examples you provided in your answer.=)

So, let me highlight the trees I feel disconsent about.

I'd argue that
- Parpetsi street (osm.org/way/380363605)
- Koghbatsi street (osm.org/way/82550803
- Teryan street (osm.org/way/133144300)
- Hin Yerevantsi (osm.org/way/371569595)
- Spendiaryan st. (osm.org/way/360172405)
- +maybe other streets I not have spotted, because I did not do an exhaustive check=)
- ~maybe~ even streets like Tamanyan (osm.org/way/26374568)

...are tertiary along their entire length. My "feel" that these roads satisfy definition in Ru-wiki of tertiary road: "главные улицы по отношению к прочим мелким улицам/переулкам, основные микрорайонные или межмикрорайонные транзитные улицы" as well as En-wiki definition of tertiary (and less so on residential)

Those listed streets are less prominent than, say, tertiary road of Tumanyana (osm.org/way/379702959), but they are still:
- serve much more for "through" traffic rather than access to neighbourhoods
- they do not have speed limits or calming measures other than their width
- very similar in role and appearance to tertiary road Pushkin street (osm.org/way/133082150)

PS: my perception, is that in your edit you prefer to keep classes so that hierarchy prevails: residential should flow into tertiary, tertiary into secondary, etc. So, (in my perception) you define the Tertiary class relative to its connections; while I think that at the level of Tertiary road class hierarchy principle gives way to the functional definition.
*I have not read anywhere, if one or another approach is preferred, so I don't know)

Apologies!
I, finally, see that your changes are *revierting* mass changesets.

Still what I saw on the ground in Armenia was not correct (but I cannot recall/find on map, what exactly, after a month). Can you, please, point to a subset of objects in Yerevan / Armenia?

As example, how do you know this is not a platform and should not have a "bus" tag?

osm.org/node/277025541/history

Can you list all the objects, this changeset affected in Yerevan and Armenia?

With such massive edit, I believe, the burden of proof lies on the one who makes changes.

What are your sources?

Hi!
What is the basis of your update of the classification of highways is Yerevan?

I found several examples of streets, whose types are not correct (e.g. often your re-classification makes tertiary road residential)