I think that makes sense.

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/in-your-area/lanarkshire/east-kilbride-railway-line-close-34396490
"The new Hairmyres station is set to open in May 2025, coinciding with the completion of the 16-week works."

This station has now permanently closed. The new station is opening when the rail line re-opens. I'm not sure if this station should be included any more.

I'd personally say that the modern use of the area as B&Bs is more significant than the fact the buildings were houses historically - I can see the other side here since there's a lot of guest houses, but I would still personally lean towards mapping them as a commercial area

I've reverted this changeset since Darnley has expanded far to the south since the sources in question were made

I've changed the other two to commercial with a link back here to this discussion.

My undrestanding was that holiday locations like hotels (or lodges) should be commercial. Caravan parks similarly - as they are mapped in Seahouses

I have reverted the name tag change to Glasgow and Inverness - primary name tag for towns/cities probably shouldn't include multilingual names, especially where there are very few speakers. If it is closer to 50/50 then both could be included (as in Brussels).

This changeset appears to have accidentally deleted part of the A811 at osm.org/#map=16/56.1307/-4.1913. I have readded this as osm.org/way/1212843828

I have reverted one change from this changeset - the Commonwealth Drive bridge was made far too long and extended through the residential area.

Edit summary selection is having issues right now, should have said "Changed road to tertiary"

Changeset comment is incorrect - changeset moved Watstone node to middle

I don't think the heath area is unbounded, but osm.org/changeset/131613865 did break up the outer parts of the relation. This might be fixable by downloading the Rigside area into the software?

I made the changes to pedestrian street sections based on this part of the highway=footway page that says the following: "For wider pedestrianized streets, typically, lined with shops or commercial buildings use the tag highway=pedestrian." These are wider streets so I assumed this was correct. I am happy to revert this though - I am quite new to this and not entirely sure on everything yet. If reverting is correct please reply to say this and I will do so.

oops

User in question has an active block (osm.org/user_blocks/6567) and won't be able to respond. The change appears to only slightly alter the border, probably safe to revert

What is the source of this name change?

In addition, what is the source for the spelling change?

I’ve reverted this edit as in hindsight there was little justification for it. I felt that some areas were over-classified as a village when they had very low population.

Update: I have reversed this change as it appears there is construction at this location - https://www.millerhomes.co.uk/new-homes/scotland/evergreen-manor-kilmaurs.aspx