Logotipo do OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Orphan nodes?

Publicado por HannesHH em 20 fevereiro 2008 em English.

Working with JOSM I recently stumbled often on orphaned nodes scattered in the Data Layers (which I downloaded from OSM). These are often located near or on streets (which sometimes are mapped) and have no tags.

Example: http://enjoys.it/stuff/OSM_orphandots.png

What should I do with those, delete them?

Ícone de e-mail Ícone do Bluesky Ícone do Facebook Ícone do LinkedIn Ícone do Mastodon Ícone do Telegram Ícone do X

Discussão

Comentário de NicRoets em 20 de fevereiro de 2008 às 18:21

My guess is that someone converted tracks to nodes instead of either (a) converting them to ways or (b) using them to improve the accuracy of existing ways. JOSM allows you to see which user edited them last (provided they are 'public') and if they have any tags. You can also try to download the GPS data from that area and see if it lines up.

IMHO, nodes without tags that are not part of ways contains to information and should be deleted. This will help prevent that annoying situation where 2 nodes are close to each other and JOSM pick the wrong one.

Comentário de Brian Schimmel em 20 de fevereiro de 2008 às 23:15

The screenshot looks as if those nodes would form a proper way if they were on a way. A friend of mine had the same issue with some coastline he mapped: There was a proper way, then someone (or something?) came along, removed the way but leaved the nodes.

If this is a major phenomenon in your area, and if it looks like there was some data that is now lost, it should be possible for some admin-like user to revert the old data.

I guess this is a rather complex procedure and is inappropriete if it concerns only one or two highways.

Comentário de HannesHH em 22 de fevereiro de 2008 às 14:09

Thanks for your answers.

The area is/was very low on content. And since I am mapping/fixing most of it anyways I will simply delete those and create new "proper" nodes. It's not many, maybe 2% of all nodes in this area. Plus they are not "good quality" anyways.

Entrar para deixar um comentário