OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
122215444 about 3 years ago

Ok, den del var en smutter

122215444 about 3 years ago

Hvad er problemet? Vi har simpelthen lavet wikidata emner for en del gader og huse her og her linker jeg dem bare.

104477985 about 4 years ago

Jeg har rettet bl. a. osm.org/way/378215305
tilbage. Se det vedhæftede billede.
Man kan tydeligvis ikke helt regne med FVSTs angivelser

107565432 about 4 years ago

Jeg har flyttet kirkens tags tilbage på bygningen

105603864 about 4 years ago

Reverted. please do not do this

103772077 about 4 years ago

Undlad helst at slette gyldige wikidata tags

101236649 over 4 years ago

The area north and east of osm.org/node/2853609300 looks like it could be growth. Please note the texture and the edge of the road. Please note that the extent of growth typically changes with the seasons

87523834 over 4 years ago

Det var vist en fejl at jeg kom til at fjerne bridge=yes.
Bemærk at ruten er ret ny og at mange detaljer derfor ikke er synlige på luftfotos endnu.

101225724 over 4 years ago

Please consider the possibility that those who edit the wikii aren't necessarily all that experienced.

101236649 over 4 years ago

Please note that it can be quite tricky to figure out from aerial imagery (both conventional and LIDAR) what is growth and what is not. My guess for example is that more of the area around the northeastern corner of osm.org/way/281411674 is actually part of the moat/water, but just overgrown.

98684543 over 4 years ago

Please note that there's really no point in intrically mapping around the growth in the river here. That's not where the riverbank actually is.

100403025 over 4 years ago

Please note that foliage and growth fools a lot of new mappers. I've readjusted this lake, so that it again reflects the actual shore.

101314935 over 4 years ago

Jo, hvis vi skal være helt nøjagtige, så er det

101225724 over 4 years ago

Why are you doing this? I'll personally recommend not to do it, because quite often piers do not start at the coastline. For that reason I have unsnapped quite a lot piers my self.

101236649 over 4 years ago

Or riverbank of course

101236649 over 4 years ago

Thanks. And please do not map around foliage or growth. That's more often than not, not where the actual shore is.

101236649 over 4 years ago

Please note that foliage of trees as well as growth can easily fool you if you're not carefull when editing water features. For features hidden under trees etc, in Denmark it's recommended to use the SDFE terrain shadow map (LIDAR), which is also available in JOSMs image menu. See my readjustment of this moat: osm.org/changeset/101247658

96344303 over 4 years ago

Jeg skal heller ikke selv påstå at være "fejlfri", men derfor kan det alligevel ind imellem være godt nok at påpege ting man med fordel kan være opmærksom på.

God Jul

96344303 over 4 years ago

Undlad venligst at importere alle mulige mærkelige tags (se ovenstående). Bemærk også at specielt når du laver ændringer på basis af meget nye offentlige data (eller hvad det nu er) er det vigtigt at angive i rettesættets overskrift.

95963726 over 4 years ago

When editing in Denmark please make sure to use our national SDFE aerial imagery, which unlike Bing etc is updated every spring