Hello, it is business that sells storage solutions specifically for garages, see their website. shop=storage seems correct, shop=organization is another possiblity.

Thanks!

Not sure what happened, but that was cute. :)

Thanks!

Thanks! I am curious how and why it was created and if it is the user problem or JOSM misbehaving.

Not sure why this got extended across the globe. All changes were mean for osm.org/relation/18162109 plus adjacent waterways.

osm.org/way/539151575

Hi, could you confirm the hours for this church - it is always open?

osm.org/way/711188450

Greetings! Could you confirm that this church is truly open 24/7? I was not able to see that from their website.

osm.org/relation/9709546/history

Osmose link:
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=11&lat=40.7754&lon=-73.8131&item=3250&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=&useDevItem=all&issue_uuid=631b548b-2ba5-c880-9dae-14ac6fdcd414

Hello! Sorry to bother you about an old edit... Osmose generated a number of warnings about interval/opening_hours combinations "Conditional interval does not fit into opening hours". in this area. I think that means OH range ends at 23:59, while interval value goes to 24:00. I'll try to fix it, but I am wondering adding an extra minute declares that there is an extra instance of service while that's not true.

osm.org/node/8770461400/history

I moved opening_hours to description. opening_hours need to show ranges. Need to resurvey OH.

osm.org/way/415443677

"these ramps are closed from jan to june" - are the closed every year or just for 2024?

osm.org/relation/17339583/history/1

Hello, the hours do not look right (a single time, not a range), this triggered Osmose warning. The hours don't match the time range posted on the website. Thanks!

Hi, about https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/9599901

Could you help me understand the meaning of interval=24:00:00-96:00:00

Osmose is flagging this as an error.

Wiki does not seem to allow giving a range for "interval" field.

Greetings!

osm.org/node/4699296936

Please consider changing:
site=tumulus TO:
archaeological_site=tumulus

Documentation:
osm.wiki/Tag%3Aarchaeological_site%3Dtumulus

I like your proposed tagging, I am happy to apply it unless you want to, let me know.

Greetings! Thanks for sending me down the memory lane to look into this! :)

Those waterway nodes are for waterholes, I am not sure if there is a better way to tag them.

https://osmcha.org/changesets/28901722/

Example:
osm.org/node/3355380830

The warnings are coming from Osmose (see the URL). That checks for multiple issues against the opening_hours. Feel free to get in touch if you have questions about it.

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=8&lat=46.034&lon=-73.3&item=3250&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=online&useDevItem=all

osm.org/node/8689522583/history

Hello, about the opening_hours:
What is LO?
Are the hours still up to date?
Can we delete the covid hours?

Hello, when entering an opening_hours value, please don't end it with a semicolon - this is triggering cleanup warnings. I recommend this tool for self checking: https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?

Thanks!

Greetings!
Thank you for adding this foot path:
osm.org/way/930755810
Navigation without such ways does not work. Please be aware about this discussion about keeping/removing these: osm.org/way/930755810

A quick comment about this style:
osm.org/way/930755810
When a way is self intercepting, it produces confusing navigation instructions (from my experience using OsmAnd). I was not able to find good description online just this: osm.wiki/Self_intersecting_way_reports
and it is listed here as well as an error to fix (see self-intersecting ways):
https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/becoming-a-power-mapper/fixing-common-mapping-issues/

The way I approach it: to be notified about a turn, make it a separate segment. Each segment should be straight or only slightly curving.

Hope this make sense!