OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
60576966 over 6 years ago

This needs to be reverted

61229434 over 6 years ago

This changeset is also problematic (e.g. osm.org/node/5799470354/history) and not yet reverted

61824030 over 6 years ago

reverted in osm.org/changeset/61825761

62960184 over 6 years ago

Did something go wrong here? Did you mean to have this changeset make changes in Toronto, Iowa, and outside San Francisco, including setting railway=rail on an area osm.org/way/628421088 and dragging a coffee shop to a residential area osm.org/node/3641029235/history... all with a changeset message about Sri Lanka?

44864729 over 6 years ago

Please also check named in this changeset, for instance osm.org/way/24007961/history and osm.org/way/341334439/history and osm.org/way/32255029/history and osm.org/way/67806253/history are misspelled

65998794 over 6 years ago

source should have been "Bing, Esri imagery"

65878702 over 6 years ago

Minor improvements in follow-up changeset osm.org/changeset/65879077

65878702 over 6 years ago

I deleted the address lines on East Main which were clearly wrong: ones that referenced addresses below 160 East Main. We know these are wrong because the bus station is at 160 East Main and they were well east of the bus station. But it looks like the rest of East Main addressing is also wrong, please see osm.org/note/1631549 to help.

65856081 over 6 years ago

JOSM messed up source tag, it should be: "survey 2018-12-26; Bing and Esri imagery; alignments off Bing imagery"

65856081 over 6 years ago

sidewalk=separate and crossing=no tags are intended to attempt to tell data consumers not to use roads for pedestrian routing

52498907 over 6 years ago

What exactly is the stars system used here? What is the source?

44748572 over 6 years ago

osm.org/way/8589544 misspelled
osm.org/way/458585544 wrong
osm.org/way/15578085 inconsistent "Saint"
osm.org/way/9153056 formatting
osm.org/way/462496327 misspelled
osm.org/way/462496326 formatting

... and that's just from a quick look on 20 of the 104 ways edited in this changeset

65486510 over 6 years ago

18 Stafford corrected in osm.org/changeset/65644827

65612763 over 6 years ago

JOSM keeps on messing up source tag for me. Source is survey 2018-12-18 and Esri imagery.

65486510 over 6 years ago

I notice I tagged 18 Stafford osm.org/way/58335955 with height 21 m and 11 levels. That was my surveying notes, so it's not a typo, but one of these is obviously wrong. Will re-survey and correct.

45852431 over 6 years ago

Thanks! Can you follow-up in osm.org/note/958633? One of your colleagues is asking about the name of a way which you changed from highway=service to highway=residential.

45852431 over 6 years ago

Hello,

what is the source for the road names for osm.org/way/130348904/history ?

65280916 over 6 years ago

Source is own survey in late October 2018. JOSM left over wrong source tag. Sorry for confusion.

65282145 over 6 years ago

Source tag is wrong, I forgot to delete previous value from JOSM. Please disregard source tag.

65135976 over 6 years ago

Thank you for sorting out the paths in this area. Much appreciated :)