see also discussion in osm.org/note/2494458

Per osm.org/changeset/86090482 the pedestrian connection from Bathurst has been removed, but it was readded in this changeset. Which is correct?

lol iD just cuts off the changeset comment, nice. it was supposed to be something like "but it's mainly for people"

FYI bounds of this neighbourhood are already mapped osm.org/way/677481104 so I deleted the node

for future reference, see related discussion in osm.org/note/2474913

Hello,

Wondering what criteria you used in making streets like Yorkville, Charles, St. Joseph, Grosvenor, Elizabeth, or Elm tertiary?

Cheers
Jarek

This edit has been reverted in osm.org/changeset/96628933, see that changeset for details

This edit has been reverted in osm.org/changeset/96628933, see that changeset for details

This edit has been reverted in osm.org/changeset/96628933, see that changeset for details

See http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3193667 and osm.org/changeset/76279772 for past examples

Thanks for the updates here, it looks great!

Hello,

With this change removing the left-turn slip roads, access from eastbound TCH to the road leading to Avoca Road (osm.org/way/184961615/ ) is no longer possible because there's no link between the 2 carriageways of TCH. Is this accurate?

iD doesn't ask - sorry - but source is survey today

Cheers! A lot of the other changes are fair enough, and I do think there was too many roads tagged as secondary downtown.

Just to let you know I'm thinking of putting together a more-or-less formal proposal to actually have some of the roads as primary, including Richmond, Adelaide, Lake Shore, and probably Jarvis. I will link you if I ever do complete and post it, to get your opinion on that.

--Jarek

Hello,

What is your logic for downgrading Richmond and Adelaide? These are the main car routes through downtown. Much of the stretch of King you've upgraded prohibits through traffic, too - that doesn't really square with being the top category in downtown.

Thanks,
--Jarek

Also changed some existing alignments which dated back to 2007

Hi SparklesMaster! As far as I can tell, you added the Old Highway 6 bridge near Little Current osm.org/way/530632710 in this edit. Current satellite imagery suggests that the old bridge no longer exists here. Do you happen to know if the satellite imagery is incorrect?

Hi rayleigh1,

Could you please take a look at osm.org/note/2294310 about these buildings?

Thank you

Please do not add fake things to the map.

Please do not add fake things to the map.