Thanks, I'll message if needed, but I'm sure it'll be fine. Thanks!

Yes, that would be okay as well, especially if that scheme is actually used by any data consumers. If someone wants to change it to that scheme I will support them.

record keeping: soemisch's comment was a response to my comment on his osm.org/changeset/52469103

Thank you! Could you also please double-check the other 100 lane names you've edited here? Several of them are still wrong, for instance on page 5 there are several lanes you've named "Woodbine Track Acces" (proper spelling "Access"). Please also check osm.org/way/8095706, osm.org/way/26103741, osm.org/note/1644198, osm.org/way/462496327/history, osm.org/way/462487375, osm.org/way/67816556, osm.org/way/24136983, osm.org/way/24007787, osm.org/way/21673094 and it would be quite good to check many of your other "first edits". Thank you.

Unfortunately both entries for Children's Hospital at London Health Sciences Centre (osm.org/node/5711674341 and osm.org/node/5711621752) are in completely wrong locations.

Sick Kids (osm.org/node/5711537321) also duplicates the existing osm.org/relation/2393230

Oh yeah, I purposefully deleted a couple of sidewalk stubs on side streets that haven't been completed in a year.

as discussed in osm.org/changeset/60763259

This needs to be reverted as discussed in osm.org/changeset/60763259

This needs to be reverted

This changeset is also problematic (e.g. osm.org/node/5799470354/history) and not yet reverted

reverted in osm.org/changeset/61825761

Did something go wrong here? Did you mean to have this changeset make changes in Toronto, Iowa, and outside San Francisco, including setting railway=rail on an area osm.org/way/628421088 and dragging a coffee shop to a residential area osm.org/node/3641029235/history... all with a changeset message about Sri Lanka?

Please also check named in this changeset, for instance osm.org/way/24007961/history and osm.org/way/341334439/history and osm.org/way/32255029/history and osm.org/way/67806253/history are misspelled

source should have been "Bing, Esri imagery"

Minor improvements in follow-up changeset osm.org/changeset/65879077

I deleted the address lines on East Main which were clearly wrong: ones that referenced addresses below 160 East Main. We know these are wrong because the bus station is at 160 East Main and they were well east of the bus station. But it looks like the rest of East Main addressing is also wrong, please see osm.org/note/1631549 to help.

JOSM messed up source tag, it should be: "survey 2018-12-26; Bing and Esri imagery; alignments off Bing imagery"

sidewalk=separate and crossing=no tags are intended to attempt to tell data consumers not to use roads for pedestrian routing

What exactly is the stars system used here? What is the source?

osm.org/way/8589544 misspelled
osm.org/way/458585544 wrong
osm.org/way/15578085 inconsistent "Saint"
osm.org/way/9153056 formatting
osm.org/way/462496327 misspelled
osm.org/way/462496326 formatting

... and that's just from a quick look on 20 of the 104 ways edited in this changeset