dragged the stores that were in the middle of the road to their hopefully-more-or-less-correct locations in osm.org/changeset/66817293

This is meant to avoid having right turns incorrectly show up as "sharp right" - the right from QQW westbound onto Bathurst was previously particularly bad for this. QQW to the west of the intersection is not split to keep street names correct and always set, particularly for the left turn from QQW westbound to Eireann Quay.

I realize that this draws left-turning cars from either direction of QQW as being to the right of cars making the oncoming left turn, while in reality they pass to the left. However this already happens in OSM on many (most?) bigger junctions where both intersection roads are split.

See also osm.org/note/1634374 for my surveying and more of my reasoning.

Hey, is that gap in the sidewalk on Transway Crescent right in front of Kennedy station intended, or a bug?

I haven't looked into the edits, but IMO naming an account "osm_validation_and_improvements" without identifying an experienced OSM user on whose behalf those edits are made is borderline bannable offence in itself - the name implies authority which is not backed up.

Oh yeah: source for hgv=no on Springhurst is survey 2019-01-03

First time working with this, sorry if something went wrong. I'll monitor this to check for problems.

Hi, thanks for importing this. But how come bottled/filtered water stores osm.org/node/6171973666/history and osm.org/node/6171973667/history got turned from shop=water to shop=hardware?

Thanks, I corrected 463454976, 32255106, and 32255093 in osm.org/changeset/66426868

Hello,

Well, this is where local knowledge and/or common sense is handy, rather than always following a source - official or not.

32255093 is a lane that is south of Saint Clair Avenue and east of Saint Clarens Avenue. But our name for it is currently "Lane South Saint Clair East Clarens" - missing the second Saint. If that's what Geobase says, Geobase is inconsistent with itself.

32255106 is a lane south of osm.org/way/23145436, which has been renamed from "Mackay Avenue" to "MacKay Avenue" by a local mapper in osm.org/changeset/5974834. We would therefore presume that "MacKay" is the correct capitalization as signed locally, and the lane name should match it.

I did not include 463454975 in my list. I did include the nearby lane 463454976 which misspells name of nearby Westmount Avenue as "Wesmount".

Thanks
Jarek

osm.org/way/32255093
osm.org/way/32718209
osm.org/way/23310313
osm.org/way/463432569
osm.org/way/32255056
osm.org/way/463425271

osm.org/way/8111595
osm.org/way/8111605
osm.org/way/8111610
osm.org/way/9327421
osm.org/way/463453477
osm.org/way/67743670
osm.org/way/67743669
osm.org/way/232723243

consistency between osm.org/way/7913146 and osm.org/way/7913158 would also be great

Hello, could you please have a look at these:

osm.org/way/463454976
osm.org/way/463454977
osm.org/way/32255107
osm.org/way/32255106
osm.org/way/26139974
osm.org/way/26139970

Thanks, I'll message if needed, but I'm sure it'll be fine. Thanks!

Yes, that would be okay as well, especially if that scheme is actually used by any data consumers. If someone wants to change it to that scheme I will support them.

record keeping: soemisch's comment was a response to my comment on his osm.org/changeset/52469103

Thank you! Could you also please double-check the other 100 lane names you've edited here? Several of them are still wrong, for instance on page 5 there are several lanes you've named "Woodbine Track Acces" (proper spelling "Access"). Please also check osm.org/way/8095706, osm.org/way/26103741, osm.org/note/1644198, osm.org/way/462496327/history, osm.org/way/462487375, osm.org/way/67816556, osm.org/way/24136983, osm.org/way/24007787, osm.org/way/21673094 and it would be quite good to check many of your other "first edits". Thank you.

Unfortunately both entries for Children's Hospital at London Health Sciences Centre (osm.org/node/5711674341 and osm.org/node/5711621752) are in completely wrong locations.

Sick Kids (osm.org/node/5711537321) also duplicates the existing osm.org/relation/2393230

Oh yeah, I purposefully deleted a couple of sidewalk stubs on side streets that haven't been completed in a year.

as discussed in osm.org/changeset/60763259

This needs to be reverted as discussed in osm.org/changeset/60763259