OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
71005069 about 6 years ago

Housekeeping/linking: This changeset prompted issues on the MapRoulette issue tracker https://github.com/osmlab/maproulette3/issues/787 and https://github.com/osmlab/maproulette3/issues/788

71028885 about 6 years ago

Also I'm pretty sure the remaining maxspeed=50 on Dundas and College/Carlton are all out of date, but would have to scroll through others' Mapillary to confirm. Some other day.

71028885 about 6 years ago

Deleted Bond Street Sunday stops (nodes 412398399 and 412398400) as Sunday stops have been abolished a few years ago.

I didn't change highway=bus_stop along Dundas to railway=tram_stop because Dundas streetcar has been under bus replacement for a while now and is expected to remain so for at least half a year more... Will be cleaning up its route relations later on.

70708636 about 6 years ago

Further to my comments on your other changesets in Toronto: additionally, your moving around of POI nodes on Queen at John like osm.org/node/5712229921/history breaks our local convention of putting amenities which are on upper floors further away from the street to visually indicate where they are. Please don't go into reasonably well mapped areas and rearrange them.

70640323 about 6 years ago

Hello,

Please don't do this in locations you are not familiar with. Some of these are signed "Starbucks Coffee", e.g. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/rfKqQlIsBY9p6KgKapsFPA for osm.org/node/6419764357

54778785 about 6 years ago

Hello,

Please see osm.org/note/1799684 about the name of the road here. Do you remember what Geobase said when you made the edit?

70696907 about 6 years ago

Is this a worldwide Maproulette quest? Is there a link to it? Did you use streetside imagery? Curious as many Starbucks around here are still signed as "Starbucks Coffee" - I don't know about this exact one...

44723183 about 6 years ago

Hello,

Here are more names to correct:

osm.org/way/69340663
osm.org/way/69340659
osm.org/way/69340656
(then resolve osm.org/note/1718388 )

osm.org/way/26139507
osm.org/way/26139506
osm.org/way/68515327
osm.org/way/114687540
osm.org/way/69340799
osm.org/way/69340728
osm.org/way/69340696
osm.org/way/69340628
osm.org/way/69340707
osm.org/way/69340650
osm.org/way/69340843
osm.org/way/69340784
osm.org/way/69340776
osm.org/way/69340667
osm.org/way/69340627
osm.org/way/82576348

osm.org/way/446074013
osm.org/way/179214820
osm.org/way/22713943
osm.org/way/462328400
osm.org/way/5647809
osm.org/way/462328400
(St. Clair or Saint Clair not "Street Clair")

osm.org/way/52007926 Saint Nicholas not Street Nicholas

osm.org/way/462322017
osm.org/way/462302066
osm.org/way/83330703
osm.org/way/83073409
osm.org/way/34620980

44700402 about 6 years ago

Hello,

Unfortunately here as well there are several mis-capitalizations and errors:

osm.org/way/35351634, osm.org/way/36518312, osm.org/way/36518326, osm.org/way/35349342 start with lowercase - please resolve osm.org/note/1796443 when updated
osm.org/way/462094737 "south"
osm.org/way/69706599 "south"
osm.org/way/462065486 "Lane East Clinton Harbord" - doesn't match Geobase, missing direction
osm.org/way/8099899 "Lane East Clinton Harbord" - doesn't match Geobase, missing direction
osm.org/way/22788167 "college"
osm.org/way/462050986 is this really named "Lane West Oakwood West Oakwood" - Geobase indicates another name
osm.org/way/462050985 is this really named "Lane West Oakwood East Oakwood" - Geobase indicates another name
osm.org/way/32118974 "south" miscapitalized
osm.org/way/462046152 name missing a direction
osm.org/way/462046151 name misspelled "East"
(please resolve osm.org/note/1770793 after these last two are updated)

Plus a few others that have been corrected already

70124488 about 6 years ago

derp, deleted cycleway=lane from osm.org/way/557114975/history by accident...

70520367 about 6 years ago

Some of the streetcar and platform alignments are estimated, because they were under construction when the Esri imagery was taken. I saw all of these from ground level, so they're not _wrong_, but they might be a metre or two off.

68571641 about 6 years ago

I have retagged those stations in osm.org/changeset/70448954 and osm.org/changeset/70448805

70399927 about 6 years ago

Seems I accidentally dragged a bit of Richmond Street along with the lane. Sorry about that, will fix at some point.

67300540 about 6 years ago

at Highway 407 station osm.org/way/671185119 we pray that the train comes? :) it got landuse=religious

70173972 about 6 years ago

Hello,

My understanding of osm.wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative (searching for Canada) and osm.wiki/Canada_admin_level is that giving Edmonton admin_level=4 makes it its own province. The fact that it's a provincial capital is indicated with capital=4.

Can you confirm that Edmonton has in fact seceded? :) Or am I misreading the tagging guidance?

Thanks,
Jarek

70165015 about 6 years ago

this changeset has been discussed in talk-ca https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2019-May/009307.html

48128985 over 6 years ago

Ah alright, thanks. I'm not super familiar - is an inclinator kind of like a really small funicular railway? For moving people up a hill?

I'm guessing you might have searched the editor presets for "cable car" or something similar - but unfortunately the one shown in the iD editor as "Cable Car" is an aerial cable car.

Of the OpenStreetMap categories, funicular is probably the closest. I'll let you fix it, no big rush.

Extra tip: If it is something like a funicular, generally in OSM "forward is up". Currently that would have it going from 15 green up to 16 tee - if that is not correct, right-click the way and reverse it.

48128985 over 6 years ago

Hi Paul,

A while back, you added an aerial cable car (a gondola) at the Mississaugua Golf & Country Club: osm.org/way/489344070

It is a straight line about 39 metres long, between the 15 green and the 16 tees.

Is there really a small aerial cable car there?

If not, do you know what might be in that location, and what it might have supposed to have been?

Thanks,
Jarek

69785101 over 6 years ago

I've also adjusted tracks I previously drew around Adelaide/Victoria - they didn't seem to match Esri now (or any imagery really) even though I tagged my initial drawing as based off Esri. Has Esri imagery shifted, or was I just crazy off?

69547643 over 6 years ago

Yes - but note that Andrew's edit was in 2011 and mine was in 2019 after I surveyed in 2019.