OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
55470273 over 7 years ago

Hello!
My previous review of your changeset was wrong, so I'm changing its
status to unreviewed on OSMCHA. Sorry for the error.
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55470273

55470273 over 7 years ago

Please ignore the previous comment, which was sent in error.

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55470273

55470273 over 7 years ago

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55470273

55473753 over 7 years ago

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55473753

55473942 over 7 years ago

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55473942

55474877 over 7 years ago

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55474877

55475099 over 7 years ago

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55475099

55475631 over 7 years ago

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55475631

55475717 over 7 years ago

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55475717

55476320 over 7 years ago

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55476320

54261139 over 7 years ago

I apologize for the confusion. I must have visited right before they removed the walkways.

Thank you for being so responsive.

54261139 over 7 years ago

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I was reviewing this edit and it seems like you could have deleted good data by accident. The deleted data is depicted in red: https://i.imgur.com/WyHux9I.png

Based on a recent visit to Rowan, plus recent aerial imagery, the foot path that was deleted still exists. https://imgur.com/a/zld8d

Accordingly, I have reinstated the paths.

If you have any questions about mapping, please feel free to send me a message.

52765273 almost 8 years ago

Hi! Thanks for your edit. You tagged these woods as landuse=forest. It can be confusing, but the forest tag is usually used for areas of land managed for forestry. You may consider using natural=wood instead (which is for marking areas covered by trees). See osm.wiki/Forest#Which_tag_should_be_used.3F

52765560 almost 8 years ago

Hi Alex. Thanks for the edits - they look great except for one suggestion. OpenStreetMap has a 'one feature, one element' principle. It's just what it sounds like: one feature in real life should be mapped with only one OSM element.

in this case, there are two OSM elements for this feature. There is a node (point) for the the Church, and then there is an area (building) surrounding it. The ideal way to map this would be to move all tags to the area and delete the point.

I made these changes on your behalf. I hope to see more edits from you!

52812004 almost 8 years ago

Hi Sarah. Thanks for the edit. Looks like you accidentally drew an area while making this edit.

See https://i.imgur.com/GJ8Ox55.png

I corrected this for you.

Thank you for helping to improve OpenStreetMap!

52998244 almost 8 years ago

Hi, I noticed your changeset comment is "Adding new construction road". You may consider using the highway=construction tag if the road is not currently usable.

osm.wiki/Key:construction#Highways

In a nutshell, you currently have this highway tagged as highway=residential.

Using the construction tag, you'd tag as: highway=construction AND construction=residential.

52081990 almost 8 years ago

No problem! If you ever have any questions I would be happy to try to answer them. Shoot me a message or an email (email address is in my profile).

52081990 almost 8 years ago

Hi Bryan, thanks for the edit. Be careful! You accidentally deleted the `building` tag. It's an easy mistake to make, but the `building` tag is important.

osm.wiki/Key:building

I corrected the edit for you. I hope to see more edits coming from you in the future!

52745227 almost 8 years ago

Thanks for the edit! Be careful: one of the road networks you added didn't intersect properly (which causes routing problems). I fixed it for you.

https://imgur.com/a/YhbjL

52745308 almost 8 years ago

Thanks for adding this! I split the building into 4 segments to reflect reality, and I added the parking lot.