Hi, I had merged it with osm.org/node/7359917955 so that's why it said deleted, but I moved the data back onto osm.org/node/7359917960 for your satirfaction

Oh that's just embarrassing! I'll take a look in the morning and fix any instances of this mistake

Oops, my bad, which node?

osm.org/way/136164600/history used `landuse=traffic_island` which is an abandoned tag, the wiki page suggests to use `traffic_calming=island` on a node instead. I'll be honest, I've never seen it used on a way before but that's not the tag that was in use

"until you deleted it and many surrounding features" - no features were deleted unless it wasn't possible to reuse the node or way. I joined the road into one line as the road isn't physically separated, I then added lane counts, added connectivity relations and later redrew the car park as that was incorrect too.

"I notice that you have also been deleting sections of pathways with the adjacent golf course, and then retracing them - the approved method of making improvements is to adapt the original, not delete other peoples work." - I'm not sure which paths you mean. I deleted a few pathways which aren't visible on imagery. It looked like the car park had been redeveloped to I simply removed a path that doesn't exist anymore.

I'm not gonna revert my changeset. At the very least I could consider restoring osm.org/way/136164600/history with the correct tag (`area:highway=traffic_island`), but since the road shouldn't be drawn as two lines since it's generally not separated. It would be a bit redundant without mapping the whole road with `area:highway=*`

No worries, I only name the land use if its a small well defined area, otherwise I go for place boundaries

Yeah, there's already a place node and it looks like this land use covers several suburbs and land uses

Hi there, many of the objects you've drawn around Hextable extend out to the road. This is incorrect and you should avoid mapping like this. ( https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/5352/should-the-edges-of-landuse-or-boundary-areas-share-points-with-streets-that-form-their-borders/5360 )

I can see you've gone to a great extent to add many details, however, some of the features you added are in fact more harmful than useful.

An example is osm.org/way/136164600/history which you added instead of a node. Splitting a way where it didn't need to be split. Routers are unable to detect landuse=traffic_island unfortunately.

osm.org/way/885960203/history didn't match the shape of the way either, as the grass doesn't extend to the middle of the road.

Feel free to join the OpenStreetMap World discord for help with mapping: https://discord.gg/4smYkq3gzp

Analyse and update bus stops using NAPTAN data **

Analyse and update bus stops using NAPTAN data **

Analyse and update bus stops using NAPTAN data **

Nice! Thank you!

Nevermind, I see this is a revert

Sorry, where's the discussion for this? landuse nodes are wrong

A smoking area isn't an attraction

Looking good! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

TIL Kent has two Dentons

Oh my bad, I'll change my preset :)

I guess not Bing lol. I usually use Bing

👎

Remove?