Source: Word of mouth, I know somebody moving into the estate and they been telling me about it

Is this lane separated by more than just paint?

I'm not sure how I feel on the use of emoji on the name tag

Selected the wrong changeset description. This fixes alignment of the Buntingford Bypass and sets lane counts

Phew! I saw a long comment and was worried I'd have to undo a bunch of work, but I'll keep that in mind as to the age of the old fhrs tags

I armchair added some details about lane counts down at the junction with Bury Street and A10 - Seeing as this work here isn't in Bing or any satellite imagery, I'd appreciate it if you, or someone else local, could validate my work nearby as it appears I have been working of older data.

Sorry this was updating lane counts, not crossings

Sorry this was updating lane counts, not crossings

If my memory serves me right, Bicester Road was 30mph too. Not sure if that's mapped

Disconnected a road from the landuse

Hi, I'm not the source of the value, I was converting the runway to a way instead of an area

---

#HASHTAG

My bad, but I obviously can't use Google as a reference. I wish there was a way to tell the date of the Bing overlay in areas

Possibly the wrong tagging here. Would appreciate some advice. Figured it should be tagged as the railway bridge extends further than the extents of the railway

It's possible they might be sharing a kitchen

Pudding Pantry is at 579, not Faux

Original node here: osm.org/node/2348296937

Faux shut down ages ago

* which need re-reviewing

*landuse

Hi Jarv, I did it as it makes it a lot easier to handle the situation where it crosses a traffic island every 200 meters or so, especially as the path on the traffic island is of a "Z" shape. There is a lane-wide hatched area down the full length of this stretch, which whilst isn't a physical barrier, is still significant enough to split for the sake of better data.