I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since you made this changeset a few hours apart from a changeset thousands of miles away. osm.org/changeset/160660662

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.

I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since you made this changeset a few hours apart from a changeset thousands of miles away. osm.org/changeset/160663036

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.

I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since this changeset is very far from any others you have made, and you didn't make any other changesets near it.

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.

I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since this changeset is very far from any others you have made, and you didn't make any other changesets near it.

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.

I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since this changeset is very far from any others you have made, and you didn't make any other changesets near it.

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.

I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since this changeset is very far from any others you have made, and you didn't make any other changesets near it.

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.

I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since you made this changeset less than an hour apart from a changeset thousands of miles away. osm.org/changeset/160658670

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.

I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since you made this changeset less than an hour apart from a changeset thousands of miles away. osm.org/changeset/160659880

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.

Updated all the nodes: osm.org/changeset/160409075

Updated 3 distant dams: osm.org/changeset/160409134

Updated 1,000 power lines: osm.org/changeset/160409201

Updated the other 400 power lines: osm.org/changeset/160409338

Updated the one relation (the decommissioned nuclear plant): osm.org/changeset/160409651

That's all of it! Thanks again for your work adding them originally.

I see that you put operator=SMUD on all these (excellently added) power lines. The Name Suggestion Index (NSI) recommends expanding then name (and putting the abbreviation in operator:short). Before I go ahead and change them all over (which I'm glad to do), I thought I'd give you a heads up in case you object, or have any suggestions or questions.

I changed some of the ones out of town already, in this changeset, as an example: osm.org/changeset/160369569

Thanks for doing this, but it looks like the recommended name for PG&E lacks that "Company" (per https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/blob/main/data/operators/power/line.json#L6326 ), so this set up a bunch of warnings. :-) I have no strong opinion, so if you want to open a PR to change NSI, go for it.

I think you got Geer Brook mixed up with the headwaters of Factory Brook, at least according to the USGS maps. I've corrected that now, but just wanted to give you a heads up in case there's a different source I've missed.

Excellent, thanks for checking and confirming the mistake! Appreciate all your work on adding the streams and relations -- it's making my adding of SARIS codes much easier.

It looks like you drew in the way named "Moody River" in this changeset. I think it may be mis-named; the USGS maps have Moody River as a nearby one, and that one unnamed, and the MassGIS Basemap names that one "Twinning Pond Brook". Do you happen to remember more about where you found that name?

Thanks for fixing this!

On osm.org/node/832238881/history , you added an obvious typo (1highway=crossing), and removed tactile_paving=yes without explanation. Please be more careful.

You duplicated a stream in this changeset (the other copy was added in osm.org/changeset/132095722 ). I removed the duplicate in osm.org/changeset/153992191 . I'm not sure if there are others?

I don't think there should be a section of the Colorado River with waterway=drain here. That breaks the continuity of the waterway, and doesn't seem to be supported by the wiki for dams: osm.wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddam . I'm going to remove it for now, but glad to discuss further.

What is/was #SLOdriveways-project-1? I can't find any mention of it on the wiki. I came across this changeset because it added some tracks inside Lake Nacimiento, which surprised me.

Thanks for the fix for the note I left!