Thanks for all your work, but I think you gave this the wrong changeset comment. It's actually in Dutton, in Canada, not in Woods Hole. :-)

Do you have a source for the voltage on this line? 510kV seems very high!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93026924

Looks like this was caused by following an incorrect warning in iD, due to this issue: https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/issues/6068
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115428488

Please don't remove a name with a misleading changeset comment like this.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115428488

Do you have a source for these bus voltages?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115403503

Given the lack of response, and the oddity of this addition, I'm going to remove it. Feel free to re-add it with a source.

Also, the same thing here -- with "[web]".

Why did you add some entries where the value is just the key, enclosed in square brackets?

Thank you for this, I've been meaning to get to it!

Heh, makes sense. I think the duplication between route and route_master is to link the two together -- but I'm not sure I understand that schema, either. I don't see any other uses of a key that starts with "ref:" and ends with a slash. If you come across any other examples, let me know!

Ah, I wasn't sure where the associated route relation was -- appreciate you fixing that! I'm sorry I didn't realize it was intended as an example -- could you say more about how the example was intended to work? It looks like "12" is the route number, while "La Cavallerizza" is the route name?

Excellent, happy to help remind you of it!

I'm confused by your tagging of osm.org/way/134605112 -- did you mean that it is now completed, or is it still just proposed? If it's complete, please remove the construction tags and the proposed values. If not, just comment here and I'll fix the tagging. Thanks!

Thanks for fixing this -- but actually, I think this could just re-tagged as:

man_made=street_cabinet
street_cabinet=postal_service

I won't do it right now (both because I don't remember how to undelete a node, and because I'd prefer to confirm it is there in person again), but I thought I'd drop the note about it now.

It looks like this changeset may have broken this relation ( osm.org/relation/11213058 ) -- I think I fixed it in osm.org/changeset/114060661 but I'm less familiar with this area -- could you check and make sure it looks right?

Thanks, sorry I didn't include the relation in the comment ( osm.org/relation/13341310 ) -- it looks like it's fixed now! I would have fixed it myself, but I wasn't sure where the proper segment should be located, so I thought I'd ask you instead. Appreciate all your work!

You removed part of the boundary with Harrison (this relation: osm.org/relation/175809 ) -- please put it back. You can see the removal here: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112524594

You added an incomplete relation labeled Huntington ( osm.org/relation/12238511 ) in this changeset. The borders of that CDP seem to be elsewhere. Could you clarify what you meant by that?

It looks like you broke the relation for North Bay Shore in this edit -- could you clarify what the boundaries are that you meant to put, and fix it?

Looks like you deleted part of the coastline by mistake in this changeset? Please fix that -- you can use the reverter UI http://revert.osmz.ru to undo the whole changeset, then put back the parts that were correct.