Thanks for correcting this! It seems clear that there used to be some small driveway here, but that it doesn't exist anymore. There are lots of other things to update and add to the map, we'd be glad to have your help with anything else that you come across.

Welcome to editing OpenStreetMap -- we're glad to have your help! I'm a bit confused by some of the changes you made here, though. You removed a more detailed outline of house at the corner of Princeton and Alpine, replacing it with a simplier shape that doesn't seem to match the aerial imagery. Could you explain where you got that from?

Please don't use layer=parking_aisle ; the correct tag is service_parking_aisle . I've changed it.

Please don't use layer=parking_aisle ; the correct tag is service_parking_aisle . I've changed it.

Please don't use layer=parking_aisle ; the correct tag is service_parking_aisle . I've changed it.

Ah, my mistake about the hotel -- I see that more recent images do show it has been turned into a CVS, so thank you for updating that.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116667172

While marking the larger area as landuse=retail is welcome, please don't remove the tagging of the Cooperstown Motel in the process.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116667172

Thanks for adding all this detail, but please use more distinct and descriptive changeset comments -- merely saying which imagery you used is redundant with the automatically added imagery_used key, and doesn't facilitate people distinguishing one changeset from another.

Thanks for all your work, but I think you gave this the wrong changeset comment. It's actually in Dutton, in Canada, not in Woods Hole. :-)

Do you have a source for the voltage on this line? 510kV seems very high!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93026924

Looks like this was caused by following an incorrect warning in iD, due to this issue: https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/issues/6068
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115428488

Please don't remove a name with a misleading changeset comment like this.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115428488

Do you have a source for these bus voltages?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115403503

Given the lack of response, and the oddity of this addition, I'm going to remove it. Feel free to re-add it with a source.

Also, the same thing here -- with "[web]".

Why did you add some entries where the value is just the key, enclosed in square brackets?

Thank you for this, I've been meaning to get to it!

Heh, makes sense. I think the duplication between route and route_master is to link the two together -- but I'm not sure I understand that schema, either. I don't see any other uses of a key that starts with "ref:" and ends with a slash. If you come across any other examples, let me know!

Ah, I wasn't sure where the associated route relation was -- appreciate you fixing that! I'm sorry I didn't realize it was intended as an example -- could you say more about how the example was intended to work? It looks like "12" is the route number, while "La Cavallerizza" is the route name?

Excellent, happy to help remind you of it!