For later reference, this changeset added a fictional road, "Chambers Street", that was removed six months later in osm.org/changeset/116517209 (thanks levandosky for catching it)

I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since you made this changeset a few hours apart from a changeset thousands of miles away.

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.

I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since you made this changeset a few hours apart from a changeset thousands of miles away.

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.

Why did you remove osm.org/way/332874228 ? The Bing imagery still seems to show a track there.

What was the point of this changeset? It looks like you altered some waterways, but it's not clear why.

What was the goal of this changeset? It doesn't seem to have anything to do with disasters.

I noticed that you have a lot of different changesets with this same description. Please try to avoid doing that; it is better for changeset descriptions to explain what changed in each one, specifically. Thanks!

I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since you made these changesets around the same time you were making changesets thousands of miles away.

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.

I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since you made this changeset a few hours apart from a changeset thousands of miles away. osm.org/changeset/160660662

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.

I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since you made this changeset a few hours apart from a changeset thousands of miles away. osm.org/changeset/160663036

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.

I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since this changeset is very far from any others you have made, and you didn't make any other changesets near it.

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.

I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since this changeset is very far from any others you have made, and you didn't make any other changesets near it.

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.

I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since this changeset is very far from any others you have made, and you didn't make any other changesets near it.

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.

I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since this changeset is very far from any others you have made, and you didn't make any other changesets near it.

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.

I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since you made this changeset less than an hour apart from a changeset thousands of miles away. osm.org/changeset/160658670

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.

I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since you made this changeset less than an hour apart from a changeset thousands of miles away. osm.org/changeset/160659880

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.

Updated all the nodes: osm.org/changeset/160409075

Updated 3 distant dams: osm.org/changeset/160409134

Updated 1,000 power lines: osm.org/changeset/160409201

Updated the other 400 power lines: osm.org/changeset/160409338

Updated the one relation (the decommissioned nuclear plant): osm.org/changeset/160409651

That's all of it! Thanks again for your work adding them originally.

I see that you put operator=SMUD on all these (excellently added) power lines. The Name Suggestion Index (NSI) recommends expanding then name (and putting the abbreviation in operator:short). Before I go ahead and change them all over (which I'm glad to do), I thought I'd give you a heads up in case you object, or have any suggestions or questions.

I changed some of the ones out of town already, in this changeset, as an example: osm.org/changeset/160369569

Thanks for doing this, but it looks like the recommended name for PG&E lacks that "Company" (per https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/blob/main/data/operators/power/line.json#L6326 ), so this set up a bunch of warnings. :-) I have no strong opinion, so if you want to open a PR to change NSI, go for it.

I think you got Geer Brook mixed up with the headwaters of Factory Brook, at least according to the USGS maps. I've corrected that now, but just wanted to give you a heads up in case there's a different source I've missed.