JesseFTW's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
160883543 | 8 months ago | I'm working on fixing this, and discussing it here. I have to take a quick break for dinner, but will try and do the rest of the fixes tonight. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagging-of-iowa-townships/121070/11 |
160888721 | 8 months ago | Ah, it was adding this node: osm.org/node/12467967215 (thanks https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz for being one of the few changeset viewers that can handle large bboxes!) |
160888721 | 8 months ago | Whoops, along with the good changes in Stratford, it looks like this changeset accidentally included at least one change over in Easton, PA, USA! It's best to try and avoid this, as it confuses monitoring tools. You can see more about this on osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets |
160494442 | 8 months ago | Heh, with just two changes so far apart, it would have been nice to put them in separate changesets to avoid a cross-Atlantic bounding box. In any case, thanks for fixing the typo. |
160664598 | 8 months ago | Please try to avoid large changeset bounding boxes like this. It helps others in tracking changes. You can see more details about this in the section
|
160723183 | 8 months ago | Why did you decide to change this? Was there a discussion about not using canoe=put_in? If so, it'd probably be good to mention it on the wiki page. In any case, thanks for all your OSM work. |
153552465 | 8 months ago | Why did you move the street light near I95 and Main Street? It seems like it is still there. For now, I've put it back in osm.org/changeset/160887806 |
159666897 | 8 months ago | Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! It doesn't look like there is actually a stop sign here (although since there isn't a stop on Salem Street, I'd hope people stop and look before merging!), so there shouldn't be an entry on OSM. Unless one was added very recently?
|
160883543 | 8 months ago | What source did you use to find the boundary for Liberty Township? It looks like it isn't fully closed. |
106789607 | 8 months ago | This added one fictional road, Devonshire Circle, that has since been cleaned up. |
106790070 | 8 months ago | This added two fictional roads, which were removed some months later in osm.org/changeset/129347329 (thanks Yury Yatsynovich) |
106790294 | 8 months ago | This added a fictional road, Cranton Street, that was removed some months later in osm.org/changeset/129347329 (thanks Yury Yatsynovich) |
106790846 | 8 months ago | For later reference, this changeset added a fictional road, "Chambers Street", that was removed six months later in osm.org/changeset/116517209 (thanks levandosky for catching it) |
160773300 | 8 months ago | I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since you made this changeset a few hours apart from a changeset thousands of miles away. StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been. |
160773307 | 8 months ago | I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since you made this changeset a few hours apart from a changeset thousands of miles away. StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been. |
155837292 | 8 months ago | Why did you remove osm.org/way/332874228 ? The Bing imagery still seems to show a track there. |
154436465 | 8 months ago | What was the point of this changeset? It looks like you altered some waterways, but it's not clear why. |
154436512 | 8 months ago | What was the goal of this changeset? It doesn't seem to have anything to do with disasters. |
159913343 | 8 months ago | I noticed that you have a lot of different changesets with this same description. Please try to avoid doing that; it is better for changeset descriptions to explain what changed in each one, specifically. Thanks! |
160595265 | 8 months ago | I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since you made these changesets around the same time you were making changesets thousands of miles away. StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been. |