Joe-w's Comments

Changeset	Kapan	Komentar
158062863	10 bulan yang lalu	Amended in changeset 158089680. Thanks!
151250500	lebih dari 1 tahun yang lalu	I doubt there's a cliff here. This changeset may need to be reverted.
142316998	hampir 2 tahun yang lalu	'Grangetown' is more commonly one word now, I'd like to see this name change reverted
136024738	lebih dari 2 tahun yang lalu	good bot
128358900	hampir 3 tahun yang lalu	'Deli & Stpre' Jass? :)
126332430	hampir 3 tahun yang lalu	Hi, yes I agree with your reasoning. Amended in changeset 126937990. Thanks!
126366644	hampir 3 tahun yang lalu	Hi Adrian, thanks for contributing to OSM! I have two suggestions for this changeset: 1. There isn’t a need to add a ‘name’ tag to these properties, since you’ve already correctly added the housenumber & street information under the appropriate tags! We try to avoid duplication where possible. 2. Having a look at other addresses in Long Ashton, it seems ‘addr:city’ should be ‘Bristol’, and ‘Long Ashton’ tagged with ‘addr:suburb’. Thanks again :)
11323651	sekitar 3 tahun yang lalu	Hi wilda69, was this changeset an accidental upload of your internal notes? I can see most of it has now been deleted, but the 4 nodes that remain don't look useful without additional details. Please could you clarify or delete them? Thanks :)
115791983	lebih dari 3 tahun yang lalu	Interesting, thanks Stephen. I noticed the street sign at the junction for the first time today. Thanks for your insight and contribution, I'll mark the note as resolved.
115791983	lebih dari 3 tahun yang lalu	Hi Stephen, where is your source for this please? An anonymous mapper mentioned this in an OSM note, I’m curious to know why as I can’t see it indicated anywhere on the street. osm.org/note/2893566
112073243	hampir 4 tahun yang lalu	Congrats on your first changeset! All the building outlines look fine to me. I've removed the amenity=dentist & healthcare=dentist from the building area as there is a node representing these tags already. Sometimes the building itself has the amenity tags, sometimes mappers create an extra node with them instead. To have both would be duplicating data! Thanks and happy mapping. :)
110978389	hampir 4 tahun yang lalu	No issues here - nice to see more details added to buildings!
110790647	hampir 4 tahun yang lalu	Hi just to let you know, I’ve removed 2 of the Greggs nodes added in this changeset as it looks like they are already present on the map. It might be worth updating your map data if it is outdated.
110153917	hampir 4 tahun yang lalu	This looks like a bad automated edit - the URL before this change was correct.
104131389	lebih dari 4 tahun yang lalu	All looks fine to me, welcome to osm. :)
102272133	lebih dari 4 tahun yang lalu	Considering this is not it's official name, I'm not sure if it's well suited for inclusion in OSM. Perhaps under the alt_name tag?
101204027	lebih dari 4 tahun yang lalu	I think the newly added Cranbourne Way way is more suited to being highway=residential. Amended in changeset: osm.org/changeset/101217015
101150579	lebih dari 4 tahun yang lalu	Can confirm. You're a legend.
101150579	lebih dari 4 tahun yang lalu	Could you fix the tagging here? :) osm.org/way/918077128
100587139	lebih dari 4 tahun yang lalu	Welcome to OpenStreetMap!