ߏߔߌ߲ߛߑߕߙߌߕߑߡߊߔ ߛߌ߲ߞߐ߲ OpenStreetMap

Changeset ߕߎ߬ߡߊ߫ ߖߐ߲߬ ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ߦߌߘߊ
170862648 2 days ago

Thank you!

167242437 3 months ago

Thanks!

167242437 3 months ago

Thanks for the additions and updates.
Is there a specific reason the website:rfnsa tag was removed?

165711080 4 months ago

Thanks for your contributions!
I've moved the names to addr:housenumber and added addr:street . Happy mapping!

120405300 over 1 year ago

Hi ivanbranco,
This is testing my memory given it was 2y ago, but I think it would have been a large old dead tree that stands out as a landmark particularly given its location near the path and viewpoint. I'll try to go out there again soon and confirm.
I think I may have used dead_tree as a value in other cases but tagging around that hasn't really standardised.

123870940 about 3 years ago

Hi, Why is the name for Onya Bike deleted? Has it changed name or is the shop closed?

124325343 about 3 years ago

Please don't delete trees and replace them with tree rows.

124322445 about 3 years ago

It would be appreciated if next time you did the comparison with existing osm data before importing. It's not nice to be deleting a whole bunch of objects and assuming that the import is right and that existing osm data is wrong.

118446965 over 3 years ago

Just confirming that Taj Agra Belconnen is indeed open again and I have undeleted it.

120114269 over 3 years ago

This change seems a little heavy handed. At the very least it would be useful to have a meaningful changeset comment so the motivation of this mass edit would be clear.

118805272 over 3 years ago

Note that this is definitely not the Bradfield scheme. The proposed height of the dam is too low for that, and some are upset about it. Note that I don't plan to map any other proposed features (e.g. the extent of the dam and location of agricultural areas). This is the minimum needed but also sufficient to put Hells Gates in context.

118805272 over 3 years ago

Looks like there's an inconsistency in the wiki because the lifecycle page lists both proposed and planned as "Planned, with a high likelihood of being constructed" osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

118808360 over 3 years ago

Yep, it's downstream near the planned central and northern agricultural area districts. The planned southern district agricultural area extends all the way to charters towers

118805272 over 3 years ago

I haven't fully understood lifecycle prefixes, so happy to take your advice on whether it should be planned.
I mapped it so that there is a reference point around which to map other landscape features, in light of the new $5.4B election promise (while recognising approval processes still have a lot to do!)

118808360 over 3 years ago

Happy for you or others to add detail. Thanks!
I'm just trying to move from a blank map because if Hells Gates Dam goes ahead there's going to be a lot of change up here, and OpenStreetMap can potentially play a role in making that change visible.

118653600 over 3 years ago

Thanks! In future it would be good to have a mention of this either in the source field (e.g. "locations approximate") or as fixme text on the individual nodes. Otherwise closing the OSM note removes the only indication we have that the locations are actually not accurately mapped.

118653600 over 3 years ago

How was the location of the shops determined? Neither the note not the imagery would show this?
Could you please confirm that a permitted source was used?

118446919 over 3 years ago

Belconnen Outdoor Power Centre is definitely closed for fixing not completely gone. It could be marked as disused or closed but shouldn't be deleted.

118446965 over 3 years ago

Hi, Just wondering what your source is for removing Taj Agra. Last time I went past there I thought they were just fixing after the explosion.
I have also been trying to add disused:amenity=yes rather than simply removing points.

117383704 over 3 years ago

Thanks! I had no ground truth that they were coffee and tea, so very happy that you've confirmed that.