This looks like a wrong edit reverted the changes. Since there were couple of other edits that had happened above this changeset the reverter option in JOSM didn't work. Deleted all the edits of this changeset manually:

changesets: 61620609, 61621069, 61621081, 61621096, 61621113, 61621125, 61621155, 61621181

Let me know if you need more information.

Thanks for the heads up Schienennagelhammerträger. I thought these small segments of roads are missed by mistake and changed them to demolished connecting to the surrounding road network. From next time will be more careful.

Happy mapping!

Thanks for the update, and data correction Merlin. Thought the road was deleted by mistake. Will be mindful next time.

Hey Miller, Thanks for the heads-up. I verified this with Mapbox and Esri imagery and committed the changes. But looking through Bing and Digital Globe imagery your suggestion looks accurate. Removing the road connection.

Changeset: osm.org/changeset/60819916

Hi homeslice60148,

It's great that you are adding turn restrictions in New York, but looks like you are adding incomplete turn restrictions in some cases. Every turn restrictions should contain 3 members (from, via and to) to be valid. Some of the turn restrictions you added were missing them. Here are some of the examples I found to be wrong. Let me know if you need some help in understanding them.

Ex:
1. osm.org/changeset/58263472
2. osm.org/changeset/58263414#map=19/40.71619/-73.83350

Thank you,
Jothirnadh

Hi David,
Thanks for flagging this. Didn't know that this is an issue with outdated imagery. Will be more careful from next time.

Reverted the changeset: osm.org/changeset/49827901

In this changeset the mapper deleted the administrative boundary and added highway tag to it

Changeset reverted: osm.org/changeset/49827864

Found this changeset through our customer feedback on having non-existing data. Looks like you are adding non existing data to OpenStreetMap in most of your edits. Looking at comments from your changesets decided to revert back this changeset as well. There are a lot of users using this map on daily basis. Please don't add wrong information to it.

Hi Rahimam,

In this changeset I found that you are removing the name in local language and adding english names. Instead of removing and adding english names you can add `name:en=*` to represent the english name and you can leave the local name as it is. It is always valuable to have names in all languages so that local people can also make use of this map.

Thanking you,
Jothirnadh

Hi MrBrown72,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding valuable data to it. In this particular changeset you added `leisure=park` tag along with name as a community center. If it is not school anymore and converted as a community center please follow OSM rules and tag it as per this wiki osm.wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre .
Let me know if you need help in fixing this issue.
Happing mapping!
Jothirnadh

Thanks for quick fix Rps33

Hi Rps333,
In this changeset `amenity=restaurant` is added along with `place=town`. Looks like it's added by mistake. Can you look into it and correct it please.

Happy mapping,
Jothirnadh

Hi zsolt d,
I came across this changeset while reviewing all global changesets in OSM changeset analyser (https://osmcha.mapbox.com/48489012/). I can see that you added `man_mage=cutline` tag for highway's. Did you do it with local knowledge? If so can you check the existence of these highways as they seem to be imagery drawings for me.

Cheers,
Jothirnadh

Wow great, thanks for responding back. Let me know if you need help, once again welcome to OpenStreetMap and happy mapping.

Hello mholiv,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap, really appreciate your work. In this particular changeset, you added buildings which are existing in per Bing imagery but the tags you added says Bing aerial imagery. Can you please confirm the source you are using to map these buildings.
Happy mapping!
Jothirnadh

Thanks for the information. Really helpful.

Hello Fafamalan,

Thanks for showing interest in OpenStreetMap and adding your valuable data. In the parks you added I noticed that you added polygon representing the shape and a node representing the same. As per OSM convention its not necessary to add a node representing the park. For now I am deleting the node.

Happy mapping,
Jothirnadh

Hello evt35,

Thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. I came across your changeset and found that you are using much updated imagery source than BING or mapbox for mapping. If possible can you help me in understanding what this imagery source is and is it legal to use this source to map. Want to confirm with you before using it for mapping other places in France.

Happy mapping,
Jothirnadh

Hello b120047,

Thanks for contribution to OpenStreetMap and adding valuable data. In this particular changeset I noticed that you are tagging residential areas as buildings. It is not recommended to map in such a way as per OSM convention. Please follow osm wiki for further information.
Ex: tagging residential areas follow
osm.wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential

for tagging buildings follow osm.wiki/Buildings