Nice, dwg can do everything without evidence, but other mapper can't do anything with evidence. Nice job edvac!

Or do you want to deny the existence of these things but have not found any basis?

woodpeck, why are you tagging 'fixme=What's this?'? It is an admin boundary, is it hard for you to understand? Or do you think it does not exist?

Hi edvac,
You revert the changeset, and made the village (node/8138514813) which established by the Chinese government and inhabited by Chinese residents outside the border of China. Please answer positively why you did this. As a member of the DWG, it is quite SHAMEFUL to violate the file [https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf]. If you fail to give sufficient explanation and prove that this area is under the control of the Bhutanese government, then I will ask another DWG members reported this change again.

About the village, see https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/27/world/asia/china-bhutan-india-border.html .Or other news about '庞达村'.

Dear edvac,
In the file you referenced (Information for officials and diplomats of
countries and entities with disputed territorie), mentioned in the article: generally meaning physical control. And you can look at the village node/8138514813 , this village was established by China not long ago. So obviously, this area is physical controlled by China now. So unless this village is bombed or demolished by Bhutan or India, otherwise it is under Chinese control, isn't it? The Chinese government does not need discussion or agreement with the OSM community to establish this village, right?

Partially reverted in changeset 110499661, restored place node 8284103715.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109735702

Partially reverted in changeset 110499014, restored some place nodes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109718181

Partially reverted in changeset 110498726, restored place node 3017894246.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109690755

Partially reverted in changeset/110376723 because of deletion of places.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109688526

xd你这把修改名称的回退了，删除地方的没回退啊
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110319464

There may be some misunderstandings. The root of the problem is that European maps (including osm) tend to use natural factors (such as the size of a city, which can be reflected in population) to determine the importance of a place on the map. However, the habit of the billions of people in China is determined by administrative factors (administrative district level). So this has caused a contradiction when Chinese mappers are mapping in China. If they follow European mapping habits, the rendered maps will violate the reading habits of Chinese readers, and vice versa, foreign mappers will feel very unaccustomed to map data in China.

所有人都受伤的世界，完成了呢

Hi, you deleted the existing places (node/6049214249) again. Please pay attention to your edit.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110239988

Partially reverted in changeset 110219932 because of deletion of place nodes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109663052

Reverted in changeset 110219443.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109660164

Partially reverted in changeset 110219355 because of deletion of place nodes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109660109

Fully reveted in changeset 110217613.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109657176

Fully reverted in changeset 110217140.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109656858

Partially reverted in changeset 110216783 because of deletion of places.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109656714

Partially reverted in changeset 110209640 because of deletion of place nodes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110047935