OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
6429006 about 2 years ago

A very long while ago, you tagged three dry washes along Lake Mohave with natural=dry_wash, which I think is the best way to tag these features. Recently, osm.org/changeset/138124132 changed all these features to natural=water + intermittent=yes, which doesn't seem right to me. Do you think we should change them back?

64613269 about 2 years ago

Once again, this seems to be a pattern of changing rare tags into more common tags, even if valuable information is lost. I noticed that the natural=boulders tag was in use (although rarely) for a variety of locations like this one, and that it seemed appropriate. Unfortunately, the user that made this change has erased the natural=boulders tag from OSM with a set of similar changes.

Sounds like the 138561473 changeset could be reverted.

15868988 about 2 years ago

Thanks for the comments. I've come across several changes by this particular user in my work on the Glossary of Landforms for the OSM Wiki (which I would love to have a real geophysicist look at!) and have noticed a pattern of changing rare tags into more common ones, even if valuable information is lost in the process.

If you think the original tags were correct, I think the 138206910 changeset could be reverted. I'd be happy to do that unless that's something you'd rather do yourself.

138313708 about 2 years ago

I intentionally used the natural=dry_wash tag here instead of natural=water + intermittent=yes. Why did you change it without discussing it with me?

137392387 about 2 years ago

I am reverting the changeset because I presume that the original mapper had correctly identified this feature, there is no direct evidence to the contrary, and magmatic dikes are common features in this part of Crimea.

64613269 about 2 years ago

The recent changes in osm.org/changeset/138561473 seem questionable. Do you agree with the changes to the tags?

88503532 about 2 years ago

I'm not sure if the changes to these features in osm.org/changeset/138124313 are appropriate. Could you review them?

106081507 about 2 years ago

I'm not sure whether the changes in osm.org/changeset/138206910 are appropriate. Can you verify them?

15868988 about 2 years ago

I'm not sure whether the changes in osm.org/changeset/138206910 are appropriate. Can you verify them?

125538089 about 2 years ago

I'm not sure whether removing the geological=rocks tag from this feature was correct. Can you tell whether the latest tag change was appropriate?

41122962 about 2 years ago

I'm not sure whether the latest changes to the Langertstein node are correct. Can you verify whether the changes to the tags are appropriate?

36304229 about 2 years ago

I'm not sure whether the latest changes to the Tierstein node are correct. Can you verify that the changes to the tags are appropriate?

128873968 about 2 years ago

I'm not sure if the latest tag changes to Deslizamiento Kantutani (osm.org/way/687473622) are correct. Do you have any thoughts about the recent changeset?

138472011 about 2 years ago

I think the convention would be to use all lower case for tag values: osm.wiki/Any_tags_you_like#Syntactic_conventions_for_new_tags
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138472011

84933003 about 2 years ago

I am not sure that the latest change of the geological=rock tag on Oberer Rodstein to material=stone is correct. Do you have any thoughts about the change?

138481633 about 2 years ago

I think the geological=landslide tag should be restored here, since the hazard=landslide tag refers to the location of signage indicating where landslides are common, and these features are not signs but the debris fields from prior landslide events.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138481633

138426936 about 2 years ago

A volcanic neck (or volcanic plug) is not a type of volcano, but a feature formed within a volcano and (in the context of OSM) exposed by erosion of the surrounding rock. I suggest we revert this to geological=volcanic_neck.

138427575 about 2 years ago

I'm going to change this back to geological=dome, since there's plenty of reason to believe this is the same type of feature as the Richat Structure.

138482010 about 2 years ago

Can we talk about the large scale change of natural=landslide to hazard=landslide? The way I understand the keys, hazard=* is for things that are an imminent danger. If a landslide is old enough that it hasn't moved significantly in a long time, it doesn't seem to present any imminent danger. That would seem to be the case for many (all?) of these features. In this case, the natural=landslide tag seems to be describing the landform created by the landslide. Were you thinking something else?

138427713 about 2 years ago

Hi,

I'm glad we can have this discussion but let's continue it in direct messages since we're already in touch there. That will give us an opportunity to have a more detailed conversation.

Thanks!