Kai Johnson's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
6429006 | about 2 years ago | A very long while ago, you tagged three dry washes along Lake Mohave with natural=dry_wash, which I think is the best way to tag these features. Recently, osm.org/changeset/138124132 changed all these features to natural=water + intermittent=yes, which doesn't seem right to me. Do you think we should change them back? |
64613269 | about 2 years ago | Once again, this seems to be a pattern of changing rare tags into more common tags, even if valuable information is lost. I noticed that the natural=boulders tag was in use (although rarely) for a variety of locations like this one, and that it seemed appropriate. Unfortunately, the user that made this change has erased the natural=boulders tag from OSM with a set of similar changes. Sounds like the 138561473 changeset could be reverted. |
15868988 | about 2 years ago | Thanks for the comments. I've come across several changes by this particular user in my work on the Glossary of Landforms for the OSM Wiki (which I would love to have a real geophysicist look at!) and have noticed a pattern of changing rare tags into more common ones, even if valuable information is lost in the process. If you think the original tags were correct, I think the 138206910 changeset could be reverted. I'd be happy to do that unless that's something you'd rather do yourself. |
138313708 | about 2 years ago | I intentionally used the natural=dry_wash tag here instead of natural=water + intermittent=yes. Why did you change it without discussing it with me? |
137392387 | about 2 years ago | I am reverting the changeset because I presume that the original mapper had correctly identified this feature, there is no direct evidence to the contrary, and magmatic dikes are common features in this part of Crimea. |
64613269 | about 2 years ago | The recent changes in osm.org/changeset/138561473 seem questionable. Do you agree with the changes to the tags? |
88503532 | about 2 years ago | I'm not sure if the changes to these features in osm.org/changeset/138124313 are appropriate. Could you review them? |
106081507 | about 2 years ago | I'm not sure whether the changes in osm.org/changeset/138206910 are appropriate. Can you verify them? |
15868988 | about 2 years ago | I'm not sure whether the changes in osm.org/changeset/138206910 are appropriate. Can you verify them? |
125538089 | about 2 years ago | I'm not sure whether removing the geological=rocks tag from this feature was correct. Can you tell whether the latest tag change was appropriate? |
41122962 | about 2 years ago | I'm not sure whether the latest changes to the Langertstein node are correct. Can you verify whether the changes to the tags are appropriate? |
36304229 | about 2 years ago | I'm not sure whether the latest changes to the Tierstein node are correct. Can you verify that the changes to the tags are appropriate? |
128873968 | about 2 years ago | I'm not sure if the latest tag changes to Deslizamiento Kantutani (osm.org/way/687473622) are correct. Do you have any thoughts about the recent changeset? |
138472011 | about 2 years ago | I think the convention would be to use all lower case for tag values: osm.wiki/Any_tags_you_like#Syntactic_conventions_for_new_tags
|
84933003 | about 2 years ago | I am not sure that the latest change of the geological=rock tag on Oberer Rodstein to material=stone is correct. Do you have any thoughts about the change? |
138481633 | about 2 years ago | I think the geological=landslide tag should be restored here, since the hazard=landslide tag refers to the location of signage indicating where landslides are common, and these features are not signs but the debris fields from prior landslide events.
|
138426936 | about 2 years ago | A volcanic neck (or volcanic plug) is not a type of volcano, but a feature formed within a volcano and (in the context of OSM) exposed by erosion of the surrounding rock. I suggest we revert this to geological=volcanic_neck. |
138427575 | about 2 years ago | I'm going to change this back to geological=dome, since there's plenty of reason to believe this is the same type of feature as the Richat Structure. |
138482010 | about 2 years ago | Can we talk about the large scale change of natural=landslide to hazard=landslide? The way I understand the keys, hazard=* is for things that are an imminent danger. If a landslide is old enough that it hasn't moved significantly in a long time, it doesn't seem to present any imminent danger. That would seem to be the case for many (all?) of these features. In this case, the natural=landslide tag seems to be describing the landform created by the landslide. Were you thinking something else? |
138427713 | about 2 years ago | Hi, I'm glad we can have this discussion but let's continue it in direct messages since we're already in touch there. That will give us an opportunity to have a more detailed conversation. Thanks! |