#RelationsWithNoType — review relations with no type tag
Апублікавана карыстальнікам Kamil Kalata 6 Люты 2025 на мове EnglishHello!
I’ve just found out that ~2k out of ~13M relations have no type
tag, ~220 of which have the type
tag with lifecycle prefix or date namespace suffix, so I’ve decided to review them manually, with the ones with no tags containing the word “type” being the first, correct some mistakes (e.g. missing type=multipolygon
) and delete the unnecessary relations (e.g. with duplicate tags). In case I make a mistake, please point it out on OSM Community topic or comment my changesets.
Regards
Kamil Kalata