First of all, Frederik Ramm suggested that DWG members may have received death threats.
It so happens that I live in a country seared by war. I have received physical threats in the past. Journalists in Ukraine have been threatened and even murdered before, the last widely known case being Babchenko’s staged death. Luckily law enforcements were able to prevent it and capture the criminal responsible thanks to timely warning.
I take death threats seriously. It is not a valid tool of argument. It is a crime. Using death threats for any purpose, both in and outside OSM, is unacceptable. Darafei here has a point, there is a reason to make such cases public.
PS. We have and interesting member here. I totally agree with the “firefighters” comparison. That being said, I believe >creating an exception in Crimea
is not the correct description to OSMF decision. On the contrary, an exception was created when this territory was included into the country that annexed it (look at how Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Transnistria (not to mention “LPR” and “DPR”) are all tagged within their legal borders - all of them are controlled by Russian Federation).
PPS. @Adamant1 Sorry to ‘spam’ again, but this is worse than bullying, and I can never tolerate nor ignore this. Discussing professional qualities is one thing, threatening is a completely different story.
Discussion
Comment from cray33 on 12 December 2018 at 12:35
So political decisions and spam are more important than the truth on ground?
Comment from Alan Trick on 2 January 2019 at 09:40
That’s an interesting point about those other disputed territories. I think it would be good to come up with clear guidelines about what constitutes de-facto control. I suspect that (as per OSM policy) those other disputed territories should be autonomus regions.