.

I am (at least currently) done with this area and won't mind at all if you have a go at it.
I see how this tagging scheme is inferior to the one you mentioned. Again, thanks for reaching out and happy mapping!

Okay, ich habe es jetzt mal als access=no eingetragen.

Thank you for reaching out! No, I am not currently working on it.
I remember spending quite some time on the wiki debating over which tag to use. There is natural=fell, tundra, heath & scrub. In the end I read the descriptions, compared the images and apparently considered tundra/fell appropriate.
I do see that those are not rendered by OSMCarto, which is unfortunate.
In general, I would still vouch for my decision of tagging (maybe fell is better), instead of scrub/heath. Yet, I certainly won't start re-editing, should you feel compelled to change the tags. I can have a better look at the inagery and wiki later, this might shed some more light on why I arrived at that decision.

Ich finde nicht, dass gesperrte Wege als disused: eingetragen werden sollten, sondern als access=restricted/no. Die Wege an sich sind ja noch in Benutzung von z.B. Naturschützern.

Is it on purpose that you added another Dunragit node(osm.org/node/8222310912) next to the existing one(osm.org/node/732870472)? Can it be deleted?

That is not optimal.

OSM is first ond foremost a database. The map gets generated from it. Just because you don't like how something looks, doesn't mean changing the database is a good idea. Rather make a change request at the renderer of choice. See osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer

Ok, thanks for the reply! I have changed it to trail_visibility=no, which is the proper tag but wanted to be sure that was what you meant :)

Update: Habe jetzt auch nix besseres gefunden. Nicht ganz optimal mit der Pferdesache, aber fuers erste ok.

Danke für deine Antwort!
Für 1. würde ich eher einen Punkt machen, der die Dienstleistung abbildet, und den Namen vom Haus zum Betreiber verschoben. Ich kann mal recherchieren, was man da so machen kann und das dann ggf. so eintragen. Privatnamen als Hausnamen sind immer ein wenig schwierig..

Zu 2.:Okay, dann trage ich das spezifischer als Autolackiererei ein.

Same problem here:
1. Your mapped buildings are not rectangular.
2. In many cases, there are no visible buildings where you mapped them. Those will need to be deleted.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145784665

Hello, thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap!

How do you know that those buildings you mapped are really there? On the satellite imagery, there isn't really much to see.

If they are there, they need to be rectangular (in most cases). In iD, you can achieve this by selecting the buildiing and pressing "Q".
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145784693