Thank you for your response! :)
I don't want to be annoying, but using Google Earth is not allowed as any source of information (be it names or aerial images). So if you got the name and stuff from there, we will have to revert this part of the edit. If you just added the url tag and did not get any information from Google Earth, then that is fine.

Again, sorry for being annoying and happy mapping :-)

Hello Pawcio,
in this CS you added the Mountain WOodland (osm.org/way/979811746) and added a Google Earth URL to it. Did you copy the outline from there, or why did you add it? On the Google Earth imagery, I see an outline of the area and the satellite pictures.

The name does not show up on any OS Survey Maps. Did you get it from Google Earth as well?

What exactly did you mean with "trail_visibility=none"? That there is no visible trail?

Ooops, I named the bays '#', I fixed it now.

Okay. As a wildcamper myself, I didn't want to delete the data, so I only deleted the tourism=camp_site and added a note and a description. (See osm.org/changeset/145679400 , if you are interested.)

Alles gut, kein Thema. Danke fuer's Entfernen :-)

Aberes ist doch klar und deutlich im Verlauf zu sehen, dass du der (gesamten) Waldstraße die Hausnr. 5 gegeben hast. Nicht den Gebaeuden, sondern der Straße. Oder bin ich verpeilt?

Sure, no problem. Sorry for my brevity, I was just scrolling through OSMCha and I've seen all kinds of stuff.

While we're at it: What about those villages named "Flood affected area"? That feels like an abuse of the name tag. Surely there is a dedicated tag for that, right?

This one: osm.org/node/8622875467

The campsite on Montana Blanca, is it confirmed? I was up there seeral times and while one could hypothetically camp there (illegally?), there is definitely no managed campsite.

Is it legal to camp there, or not? If not, we should definitely say so.

Please, do not use all CAPS adding the name, except if it is in fact the proper orthography. If it is not, please change it.

Da fehlt ein building=yes. Gerne noch mit disused:building=church (siehe osm.wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix).

Hier (osm.org/way/313506020) dasselbe Problem wie im anderen Changeset.

Servus, du hast hier (osm.org/way/489805201) aus Versehen die Hausnr. auf den Weg auch noch gemappt.

Servus,

bitte nicht die Adresse zu einer Straße hinzufuegen (wie z.B. hier geschehen osm.org/way/1086489757 ), sondern einen Node machen und sie dort hinzufuegen, bzw. das Gebaeude direkt damit versehen. Siehe auch: osm.wiki/DE:Key:addr:*#Wie_kartieren?

How can this bridge (osm.org/way/627526205) have an address?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145372254

That's what I thought. I will add some tags to indicate the sketchiness of the way. Thanks for the quick response!

Please, assign the road a highway tag. You deleted the existing one.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145163428

You have to map the entire area with healthcare=hospital and the buildings only with building=hospital
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145195663

Please, delete this fire hydrant from the 0,0 coordinates.