Should it not be `building=service` ?

3. You have duplicated Nai Chung here. This has no effect.

1. `=isolated_dwelling` is only for a independent settlement (as in village) with 1 or 2 households. This meets neither criteria.
2. Again, the standard for housing estates in HK is to use `landuse=` . Please don't use `place=`.

38e. "The alignment of Nin Fung Road extension through the knoll would impact these
fung shui sites and the villagers’ customs and traditions" https://www.tpb.gov.hk/en/meetings/TPB/Minutes/m1249tpb_e1.pdf#page=54

36a. "Nin Fung Road would be
extended to connect the proposed new access road which would be the
access for Sites A and B1." https://www.tpb.gov.hk/en/meetings/TPB/Minutes/m1249tpb_e2.pdf#page=40

1.4.2. "Resumption of some private lands within Village Environ Boundary (VEB) might be
required to extend the Nin Fung Road for traffic connection to Site 1. " p.2 https://www.pland.gov.hk/pland_en/info_serv/ava_register/ProjInfo/AVRG159_ExpReport.pdf#page=6

osm.org/note/new

Please don't create a new point with nothing other than `fixme=` . Add the `fixme=` to other features, or use osm.org/notes visibly.

Stop accusing others of things like "obsession and imagination". I already explained to you why the project description didn't say extension. By your logic, no other roads should be named until gazetted and opened. This obviously runs counter to how `=construction` is used.

1. Are you aware I'm not the one who has used `highway=construction` ?
2. Then you should be the one who change it `proposed:highway=` . That's irrelevant to you wrongly removing `name=` , `lanes=`, and `sidewalk=` .

2. Please don't use `=dismount` . Aside from the fact there is no difference with `=no` on roads, `=yes` on routes mean they are allowed to be brought on them. `motor_vehicle=yes` certainly doesn't you can drive on a car ferry.

Why are you deleting all of them??? That's what the lines should be enhanced to.

Please don't add `=traffic_signals` to the point of intersection when it is already added to the stopping line. This is duplicated.

Please don't remove other valid names. Move them to `*_name=` as seen here.

How did you tell whether some of them are single? Regardless of that, and whether it is is preferred, you didn't replace them with `natural=tree` , and is thus removing data.
You broke a large `=multipolygon` here, and also deleted a `=bare_rock` later .

Please stop changing `=uncontrolled` to `=unmarked` when there is already `crossing:markings=no`

This is not what `company=` is used have. It duplicates info with the `=substation` .

Surely everyone refers to them as "Star Ferry" .

And you are notorious for accusing others without responding to them.

osm.wiki/Why_can't_I_delete_this_trail%3F

Hi, please read osm.wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property and osm.wiki/Why_can't_I_delete_this_trail? for issues. This is not preferred. The exact conditions should be recorded, not deleting because you want to do something based on good intentions.

You also removed other attributes.