Please don't `loc_name=` of other features on housing estates. Use OpenHistoricalMap.

Please don't add descriptive labels to `name=` , which is for proper names only. `description=` has already been used.

https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=11216261

Please stop fiddling with the data for debugging. Besides both `oneway=yes` being wrong, and you swapped `lanes:forward=` + `lanes:backward=` , routing graphs don't get rebuilt very frequently.

I don't see what you are doing, and you removed `name:en=`

Please don't blindly follow map labels and sign titles directly. They can be made in different formats for presentation and viewing.
Top-right mentions them separately. It's very clear it means different sections. Furthermore, the plural "trails" suggests it is a system, not a single `route=` .
Please read osm.wiki/Names#Multiple_names and osm.wiki/Walking_Routes

Please don't add descriptive labels to `name=` , which is for proper names only. `description=` has already been used.

Please don't add multiple names to `name=` . `alt_name=` should be followed. Furthermore, they should have a `route=` created, not be added as `name=` .

You broke it by merely disconnecting the `=steps`

What was wrong here? You simply replaced a `=sidewalk` with `=pedestrian` ?

Please use descriptive upload comments, not something unrelated to the main topic as "roads"

Please read carefully. `oneway=yes` is used with `oneway:bus:conditional=no @ *` and `oneway:bicycle=no` here.
osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
osm.wiki/Key:oneway:bus

Please completely transfer tags when you delete and redraw. That's not preferred for this reason. Adjust the shape.

Please don't directly delete them, as they represent a shop space, and this does have addresses or other info. It causes more work to add back new tenants later, and waste previous user's effort. Please change it to a plain "point" to eliminate it.

Please don't directly delete them, as they represent a shop space, and may have addresses or other info. It causes more work to add back new tenants later, and waste previous user's effort. Please change it to a plain "point" to eliminate it.

Please don't remove `building=` from actual buildings. `=substation` should only be separated when there is an entire fenced site for it.

1. You should change it to `sidewalk:both=separate` , not remove the `sidewalk=` only. Furthermore, the network of `=footway` should be ensured to be correctly drawn and fully connected.
2. We discussed this recently. `=use_sidepath` is technically not accurate. It isn't illegal to walk on the carriageway.

Please don't change `=mini_roundabout` points to a `junction=roundabout` line. They exist in this form for a reason. The center is traversable. Larger vehicles can travel through it as a standard intersection.

Please don't change `=footway` to `=path` . `=footway` has a specific meaning. `=path` alone is generic and unclear.

Please don't directly delete them, as they can have addresses or floor info, and still represent a store space. It makes tracking and updating new tenant later difficult. Simply changing them to a plain "Point" to eliminate them.