May I know where you get the info for ATC?

As well as _link

Nor how names and what `ford` means.

"Not to be private cars centric." you clearly don't understand how access restrictions work.

What's wrong with it?

You also haven't added restrictions for "no for minibuses, trucks, cars."

1. Please respond on appropriate changeset comments.
2. Please understand how `no, `designated` and `permissive` works.
3. Can you explain which "bus routers" has this faulty behavior?

osm.org/changeset/72457297

Also you again used `motorway` wrongly when it is a _link

( `access=permissive`)

2. `motorway` is for Tunnel control area. Please don't extend them.

This is wrong. `access=designated` does not mean what you think. Other access restrictions are redundant.

Why would you do that?

Please don't delete ways and replace them with faulty tagging.

While the other edits are annoying, this isn't the right way either.

Try to use Replace Geometry next ime.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72247495

Even if it's not a `highway=service`, it may be a `track`.

That's not relevant to access. Service vehicles can be transported there by any means available.

Fyi, the problem is only that the previous editor misclassified into a lower road type. This section isn't Expressway.

osm.org/changeset/72080149