Why don't you keep `natural=rock` and preserve the original name?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76682851

Should this not be represented by a sign object instead?

3q
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76624626

Why would you do this?

You can find an interesting case nearby: osm.org/way/25589682. There is a wide sidewalk and de facto motorcycle parking usage on the off-slip, but no sidewalk on the on-slip.

As a remedy or interim measure, I added `motorroad=yes` and `motorway=no` to these cases.

On the logic here, I suppose it is:
1. Pedestrians are allowed on the sidewalk.
2. Two-lane off-slip don't have to obey the keep left unless overtaking rule.
3. Possibly private road, thus with maintenace and legal concerns.

This is a big problem. There a lot of sections only leading to Expressway, or Tunnel Area (that currently `highway=motorway` and `=motorway_link` applies), that are not designated as such themselves, both on main lines and _links. Particularly significant problems I see are for example Lion Rock Tunnel, and Hung Tin Rd.
This was kinda discussed with GeoidDude before in specific cases.

Reverted, www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75946921, www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76360490

I'm not sure if `motorway=no` does the trick.

This is incorrect. Please check the extent of motorway section.

Thing is I think it should be connected to the existing main line.

You also need to describe the source better. Only I would know what that imagery is, because you told me.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76255656

No one would be able to work with this unless you provide that.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76255656

Hey look, I'm not saying you are wrong, but you need to upload your offset data first.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76255656

Is this visible? Or maybe it's more suitable for OpenHistoricalMap?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76201705

Fixed osm.org/way/297494312 in osm.org/changeset/76097822
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76093769

I removed the node. osm.org/changeset/75948073

This broke the station area outline. Please check the history. The node was added by a user unfamiliar with the area.

This is incorrect. Main line should not be _link.