Hello，個水壩嘅數據已經有，睇唔到應該係Maps.me個apps問題？
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81619852

I should add:
3. Don't take "service road" literally.
4. Tunnel service road should be `access=private` (eg blocked off, working area), or I suggest `access=discouraged` (allowed). `access=permit` means there is a permit that can be applied to travel there, which is wrong.

Unfortunately, it is not correct. Take it with a grain of salt as it is written by some people without actual consensus
1. Guideline-wise it refers to lowest level of road in network that can be considered distributor. The quality and standard description is wrong.
2. Universally, `=residential‘ means local public roads providing only frontage and access. This one should be a `=unclassified`

This is on the correct side. It should be `tunnel=building_passage`, more enclosed than `covered=yes`.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81596117

Can you explain what and by what standards you are doing? A lot of them are not "stub ends", and provide useful information.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81561425

Also in HK, "unmarked crossing" should be `crossing=uncontrolled`. (don't mind iD editor app's warning)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81533160

Also `traffic_calming=island`.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81533160

"pedestrian area" (`highway=pedestrian`, `area=yes`) actually means a "pedestrian road" area, which is a road area vehicles can physically travel on (not necessarily legally, but think about emergency and service vehicles). osm.org/way/776675366/ would be `highway=footway` + `area=yes` instead, and you can add `crossing:island=yes`.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81533160

This is a public "private road" that is outside the premise. It should be treated as a frontage road. Moreover, there is a crossover function performed by this road. That's why it could be a `highway=residential` or `highway=unclassified`.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81449613

As mentioned before, this is not the intended meaning of `highway=motorway_link`. I may suggesting using `motorway=no` for these. If you have any better idea, please let everyone know.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81401127

Please don't remove incorrect tags without correcting them. Is this not a `amenity=community_centre`?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81358474

See osm.org/changeset/81330112 and osm.org/changeset/81329956

If it is a mistake, then we will need to think about where to tag "Afternoon Beach", instead of slapping it together with "Kwun Yam Wan Beach".
Don't take the principle literally. If the most common name differs from the sign or official name, it still prevails.

"Kwun Yam Wan Beach" is the alternative name.

Kwun Yam Beach would be the official name. That doesn't mean it is "correct". It would be correct if no one calls this one Afternoon Beach.

Yes, but it is possible this one is also called Afternoon Beach.

Be careful of copyrights when you refer to other sources. osm.org/changeset/81325822

1. Please don't remove existing names when adding names. Move them to other tags.
2. Please don't directly copy from other maps.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81325427

I'm also not sure if it should be `highway=primary` east of Hill Rd Flyover
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81265247

You better consider classification of Third St, Western St, and Smithfield together.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81265247