`traffic_signals:sound=yes` is assumed in HK by default, not necessary to add to all exhuastively. `tactile_paving=*` is tricky on nodes, because it is not clear where it is (kerb, or crosswalk path that exist in other countries); although you may similarly say it is assumed on kerb, or that it is assumed to exist for `crossing=traffic_signals`.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85334383

For continuity, please use `=motorway_link` annd add `motorway=no` for such case
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85322272

In this case, you can draw a new area for the mall, and move the tags to it. The existing area should still exist for the carpark and base of the clubhouse.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85298276

(the one added before)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85257983

Thank you first. Do you know if there is actually a name for them? They sounded like very vague and unreal.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85257983

Should they be the same class?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85206155

Hi again, you should change it to at least `building=yes` instead of removing the tag completely.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85202152

Please check their definitions before you change the tags

Please check any information remaining before you remove any object. Avoid connecting areas to lines
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85199855

Please check the definition of `highway=living_street`. This should not be one.

`man_made=tunnel` is not as wide-spread as `man_made=bridge`, thus the difference in commonness.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85143384

I would like to add that there are other questionable mapping practices I decided to remove or nullify (made them `fixme=`) for now:
1. Adding `place=locality` to the resorts
2. Adding a duplicate `tourism=theme_park` at the center as a label
3. Making resort area `boundary=administrative` `relation`s

Added resort areas (also a bunch of other additions and fixes for them)

I made a try osm.org/changeset/85106366

Please don't remove `crossing=traffic_signals`, especially not at mid-block crosswalks without `highway=traffic_signals`.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85008388

Please don't remove `crossing=traffic_signals` and yet to be determined bike-path end barriers
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85005778

Please don't remove `crossing=traffic_signals` and yet to be determined bike-path end barriers
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85005778

Please don't remove the bike-path end barrier either,
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84996017

Nor remove them
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84996017

Please don't change `crossing=traffic_signals` to `crossing=marked`.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84996017