OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
87092295 about 5 years ago

Please check the connections
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87092295

87092222 about 5 years ago

This is not correct. It is not considered R1's exit.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87092222

87089499 about 5 years ago

Please don't remove and merge island-separated road
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87089499

87065317 about 5 years ago

This is a live database. Please don't commit vandalism.

87031393 about 5 years ago

Please use `tunnel:name=` for this/.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87031393

86935441 about 5 years ago

This one should be a `highway=pedestrian`. Notice the lowered kerb. The bollards should be removable.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86935441

86932879 about 5 years ago

This is R2's exit from Lei Yue Mun Rd
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86932879

86904136 about 5 years ago

I suggest `=unclassified` to factor in Hornsey Rd.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86904136

86879536 about 5 years ago

Who do you think added those remarks? I explained several times on this. Why don't you yourself go and take everything into account.

86879536 about 5 years ago

Keep on repeating your own piece of dogma without looking at it, you won't go anywhere with this behavior

86883892 about 5 years ago

Not to mention to use descriptive changeset upload comments

86883892 about 5 years ago

Please keep your changesets local and relevant, and consult the local community before making signficiant changes.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86883892

86883976 about 5 years ago

I don't see why you keep doing this despite previous discussions osm.org/changeset/86886372
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86883976

86883421 about 5 years ago

osm.org/changeset/86886317
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86883421

86883421 about 5 years ago

Again, please don't make streets "_link" for the sake of it.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86883421

86883492 about 5 years ago

This is inconsistent, even after multiple discussions
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86883492

86878500 about 5 years ago

Please don't create an entire `=trunk_link` when there is none.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86878500

86879536 about 5 years ago

Are you going to reply or what?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86879536

86833215 about 5 years ago

The `=primary_link`s are correct as they were.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86833215

86782125 about 5 years ago

Think about how they will be implemented as individual lines, without turning restrictions in place, as done historically before.