One may further argue `=motorway` can follow the point of last diverge as well, extending beyond the `=motorway`-area limit. This is debatable, as what you may object here. That's one of the reasons `=motorway_link`

I myself dislike `=motorway` and `=motorway_link`, but this is the legacy.

There is no requirement for the `=motorway_link` itself to be in a `=motorway` area.

The definition of `=motorway_link` is that it connects to `=motorway`. Would you explain to us how this doesn't fit.

1. You haven't replied on previous discussions, which holds some consensus among others
2. I have repeated repeatedly that the purpose of this is to handle non-Expressway connections to Expressway. `=motorway_link` is the best compromise to handle this.

3. Also you deleted `wikipedia=`, `wikidata=`, and `name:*=`

1. The name is no "tunnels"
2. Please fix and give feedback to your application. There's no point in modifying legal restriction here.

This is specific, while the other name is quite general.

There should be multiple "煙墩" in HK

`name=` needs to be the most common name.

Also the `natural=` feature tag is removed

This point refers to the rock face, for climbing (with equipment). You need create a new point for the rock overall

osm.org/changeset/96139214

osm.org/changeset/96139214

Please don't remove other valid names. Add other names as needed.

Can you explain where are the duplicates? Especially for osm.org/node/6227283533/ it's referring to the slope below, not the ridge.

Please don't remove other valid names. A hole also sounds more fitting than the rock. You also broke the `natural=` feature.

Please don't connect areas to roads

Please don't connect areas to roads

Please don't connect areas along roads