Please don't use `=peak` if it's not a high point over the entire surrounding.

Please be careful not to move unrelated features onto `boundary=administrative`.

Is this ever used? Please don't make up your own names by transliteration.

You can get in trouble if you are trespassing into other restricted facilities too.
The article is about its historic interaction. It's at most classified as paramilitary, which can include anything from SWAT to guards.
European `military_service=gendarmerie` belongs to the armed forces.
Doing so obscures the difference between eg Russia's GRU and SVR.

Looks like transliteration.

Please don't remove other names. `name=` is for the common name only. Add other variations in `alt_name=` etc.

Please don't move `=peak` away from `=ridge`. If there are separate ones, add another back to the origin.

UK:
GCHQ osm.org/relation/52434
Mi6 osm.org/way/32998733
MI5 osm.org/way/25895232
(which are not "military" anymore)

How is CIA `=military`? `=government` is not the best, but at least there is consistency for non-DoD agencies in the IC with NSA. osm.org/way/186025617
UK:
GCHQ osm.org/relation/52434
Mi6 osm.org/way/32998733
MI5 osm.org/way/25895232
(which are not "military" anymore)

NSA osm.org/way/186025617

Doesn't mean it's correct. That's wrong too. osm.wiki/Lying_to_the_renderer
Besides there would be `military_service=` and `service_branch=` for actual military intelligence. CIA is not even a uniform service. At least NSA (and DIA or NRO) is in DoD, but it is still debatable.
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/186034091/ was changed recently. While `=government` or `=governmental` is not popular, there is `=institutional` and `=civic_admin`.
The level of security doesn't mean it's `=military`. Eg nuclear research; or mint, gold, and banknote printing.

Please don't use `landuse=military` if it's not military.

2. The towers are clearly on the west side though?

Please be careful. You have removed the number of towers. Turning stations are not passenger "station"s, and you have created duplicates for them.

6. You removed the western sidewalk of Hung Hing Road south of the crosswalk.

5. `crossing:markings=` has excluded this.

5. Please don't use `crossing=` `=marked` or `=unmarked` for cautionary crosswalks with look left/right text only. This is ambigious.

Please use descriptive upload comments, and respond to discussions. Otherwise ungrounded edits will be reverted.

Also `level:ref=G` is `level=0`.

`cuisine=coffee_shop` means it provides coffee shop food. It is already an `amenity=cafe`.