Kovoschiz's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
140972043 | almost 2 years ago | For completeness, `*cn_ref=` is valid when they belong to a `=node_network` |
140972043 | almost 2 years ago | There is complain in osm.org/changeset/140987678 |
140987678 | almost 2 years ago | This user has been mass removing `*cn=yes` in cases where the `route=bicycle` doesn't exist. |
140988135 | almost 2 years ago | Have you discussed this before? The situation is `surface:colour=` means the `*cn=yes` . as such it can only have one `network=` , making `network=` usable. These `route=bicycle` are not really existing, and I don't agree with `network:type=basic_network`. |
140975525 | almost 2 years ago | Please don't add not yet opened features directly. They should use eg `construction:leisure=swimming_pool` . |
140973871 | almost 2 years ago | Please don't delete it. This is the result of previous flawed edits. It should be fixed up. |
128193554 | almost 2 years ago | `highway=service` + `area=yes` is correct here. The `=station` + `=bus_station` should be moved. |
140703606 | almost 2 years ago | Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=` , which is for proper names only. `=construction` already indicates this. |
140939554 | almost 2 years ago | Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=` , which is for proper names only. This confuses whether they are named already. `proposed:name=` hjas already been prepared. |
140920347 | almost 2 years ago | Please don't add fictions restrictions. `=use_sidepath` and `sidewalk=` is enough. |
140828800 | almost 2 years ago | The `=retaining_wall` itself is very short. And there's a large gap here. |
140828800 | almost 2 years ago | This is not true. There is a large slope behind the `=retaining_wall` , which this is trying to capture.
|
140828800 | almost 2 years ago | 1. I'm not the one who added it first
|
140864189 | almost 2 years ago | `destination:ref=` is only used when the outgoing road is immediately that `ref=` . Otherwise the routing towards that is `destination:ref:to=` . |
140842715 | almost 2 years ago | Please don't upload test edits. This is vandalism. |
140781010 | almost 2 years ago | Someone else added it. The slope together with the `=retaining_wall` exists. Same with the slopes to the west in the terrain. |
140826962 | almost 2 years ago | The bad idea here is you keep on deleting something others added without good reason. |
140828800 | almost 2 years ago | Why don't you explain how it's non-existent? |
140812911 | almost 2 years ago | `label` is not suitable, as `place=` is inappropriate for them. |
140812911 | almost 2 years ago | Have you done any research? Your logic doesn't make any sense. The `admin_centre` are a placeholder only. |