Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=` . That's for proper names only. It should be akin to what it would be named after completion.

You misunderstood this. There is already `telecom=` on the `landuse=industrial` osm.org/way/854227561 of the site. That `industrial=` is for the `building=` , because I don't agree with `building=data_center` yet. This would cause duplicate `telecom=` features.

Please don't delete them directly, as they contain an address, and represents a shop space. Change it to a plain "point" , which removes the tags.

You misunderstood the situation. The original park is of course by LCSD. That's not related to who the new part's underground or frontage belongs to.

Please don't include objects inside as `inner` . They are part of it.

Please notice that the 2 `inner` has been wrong included here. They should be excluded.

Please don't delete it directly, as it contains an address. Change it to a plain "point".

`access=military` is not standard. At least `private=military`

1. Please don't use `historic=castle` for non-"historic" features. This is fake and misleading.
2. `tourism=attraction` should not be used for individual `attraction=` inside a `=theme_park` . This is meaningless duplication and pollution.

This is a rock under the mountain Lion Rock. Local names won't be translated accurately.

I mean if you take it to the extreme, it won't be realistic to split it based on whether construction has started on each section either. The exact flow belongs to OpenHistoricalMap.
The project ceremony commenced at the end of last month. Temporary sites have already been handed over before. Contract signed with contractor this week.
Also remember OSM is not always updated frequently in applications.
Other `proposed:*=` features are much more loose. You won't put Route 11 and Tuen Mun Bypass in the same namespace as this.

Please don't remove addresses. They should be preserved somehow.

You can at least discuss why they should be deleted? Unneccessary doesn't mean not accepted.

Warning:
This guy (GSF1200S), knowing nothing about the difference between different users, accuses others of doing things they didn't do on random changesets of others.

Please notice that this is already added in `tunnel:name=` . `name=` is used for the common name. so I decided not to use this here, as it is a short and minor tunnel. For a different reason, Shing Mun Tunnels and Lion Rock Tunnel don't use the individual section and bore names.

My intention for the `name=` of `public_transport=stop_position` is to reflect the name in the direction, similar to `=stop` in other modes. So it should use "Central" , not the exact pier. That's reflected in the `=pier` , similar to `=platform` .

Please don't remove `highway=crossing` when the `=service` is not flat, and there are crossing facilities for it.

Please don't use `=wastewater_plant` for `=pumping_station` . That's for sewage treatment only.

Please don't detach `highway=pedestrian` from roads.

Please don't delete casually. You broke a `enforcement=traffic_signals` here.