2. Please use OpenHIstoricalMap for these. OSM is for the reality now.

Please don't use `place=village` etc. They are already rendered with `=locality` , and on eg Historic Places with `*:place=`

醫院管理局大樓不是醫院，不應有 `=hospital`

1. Please don;t add projects that are only plans now as `=construction`
2. Please don't add descriptive labels to `name=` , which is for proper name only osm.wiki/Proposal:Subject#Examples

2. `layer=` should not be added to an `amenity=` . `=-1` is only a relative order, doesn't mean it's underground or lower than ground. `parking=underground` already expresses enough meaning.

1. Please notice this object is for the whole phase including both the mall and estate, which have different identities. `name=` is for the proper name only. Don't add descriptive labels, with commas. osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
2. `layer=` should

Please don't merge casually. You are removing info without transferring them.

This still cause a mismatch between the primary section. and name of the lower forms. Please lookup how `landuse=education` is used. Separate features is used when they have a separate identity.

`landuse=brownfield` already means it's "former". Descriptive labels should not be added to `name=` , which is proper names only. The lack of the PoI icon already shows it's not a `=school` as well. osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Please don't merge arbitrarily. You removed the tapering section with `placement=transition` , and caused `turn:lanes=` to only appear downstream of the stopping line.

2. The original works fine
osm.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=22.34210,114.19834;22.34234,114.19904
osm.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_car&route=22.34210,114.19834;22.34234,114.19904

1. Please don't use upload comments to debate. Actually reply on changesets.
2. What's not represented by osm.org/relation/13324778/ ?

2. Also please don't delete casually. You didn't transfer all the info. Eg the `=traffic_signals`

Sorry please ignored. Confused who did this.

Please don't draw a circle for `=turning_circle` . It and `=mini_roundabout` are transversable, and only represented by points.

Again, turning restrictions are indicated by `type=restriction` . Please check them carefully by clicking on the intersecting points. Physical layout has no raised sepation.

Please don't split when there is no raised physical separation.

Please don't draw a circle for `=mini_roundabout` . They are transversable.

2. Double solid line is indicated by `change:lanes=`

Please understand that roads should only be split into a pair of lines when there is raised physical separation. Turning restrictions are shown by `type=restriction`