`parking:*:restriction:reason=driveway` is used for `=service` roads. There is clearly none here.

`substation=` `=distribution` is for larger district level ones. `=minor_distribution` should be used for buildings and sites.

2. Please don't move `barrier=` to intersecting points between `highway=` . This is invalid.

Please don't disconnect true `=pedestrian` from roads. They can physically accommodate cars.

1. Please don't delete linear `highway=` when creating `highway=` + `area=yes` . They are needed for routing.
2. `=pedestrian` should be used for pedestrianized street area which can physically accommodate cars. Otherwise `=footway` should be used.

1. Please re-read guidelines
osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
2. This is a raster basemap style, not a map app. An actual app would have clickable icons to show each feature.

Don't upload personal edits to a live public database. This is vandalism.

Please see previous

osm.org/changeset/154786130

osm.org/changeset/153239869

osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

As shown by the Olympic Ave example, PWP item titles don't work either. 2HL covers the entire batch. Now you have to use the contract name, or basically anything people want. This is fine when creating a printed map on paper yourself for labeling. But OSM is a digital map database. It doesn't need "(WIP 2024)" etc. It needs some standards that can be followed.

https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr2023/english/fc/pwsc/papers/pwsc20230208pwsc-12-1-e.pdf

It has been dubbed "the Olympic Avenue site". Clearly the site is called Olympic Ave. I will only align with other sites here.

You are simply setting up a slippery slope for others to change into arbitary titles. This has already happened before with Kai Tak site numbers, and land lot numbers.

That's what `description=` is for. Adding such such info to `name=` based on rendering concerns violates 2 good practice.

https://www.districtcouncils.gov.hk/kwt/doc/2020_2023/en/dc_meetings_doc/21704/21_D_2022.pdf
"下稱「 青衣西路用地 」）" clear evidence the site can simply be called Tsing Yi Rd W

No offense to others who did their part, but for example it would be more ridiculous to have `name=重置駿業街遊樂場設施至康寧道公園及牛頭角配水庫 Reprovisioning of Tsun Yip Street Playground facilities to Hong Ning Road Park and Ngau Tau Kok Fresh Water Service Reservoir` osm.org/way/121158738

https://www.housingauthority.gov.hk/en/business-partnerships/resources/information-platform-non-insert-recyclable/location-plan-of-active-sites/index.html
Besides items labeled with street names, those "Public Housing Development" labels still have a proper name eg https://www.pland.gov.hk/file/resources/approved_pb/hd_pb/pdf/Long_Bin_Phases_1_and_2_Yuen_Long.pdf

Can you please check the dictionary for the meaning of proper names?
Also you are still wrong. There's no PWP title as "Tsing Yi Road West Public Housing". Site formation is Public Housing Development at Tsing Yi Road West, which is exactly what should be avoided. It's undesirable to have real estate agent style names either, which everyone can call them differently.
In fact, the road names can form the project titles and site names https://www.pland.gov.hk/pland_en/resources/approved_pb/hd_pb/index.html
https://www.pland.gov.hk/file/resources/approved_pb/hd_pb/pdf/Ching_Hong_Road_North_Tsing_Yi.pdf
https://www.pland.gov.hk/file/resources/approved_pb/hd_pb/pdf/Ching_Hong_Road_North_Tsing_Yi.pdf

1. `description:zh=` has already been used here

`name=` should be for proper names only, similar to what might be used after opening. Don't direct copy descriptor labels coined by others, or the entire project heading.

Please stop reusing useless upload comment. Use descriptive comments. Very basic format possible: Location + Feature type