OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
164919426 4 months ago

Text alone can't prove anything. You can't tell what's where, especially with how much the terrain has been altered here. The date describe is unknown. Their source is also not given. Heights are missing as well.

164963508 4 months ago

This is already clearly indicating it's for a `demolished:place=hamlet`

164963508 4 months ago

Can you please stop adding random `place=` ?

164723207 4 months ago

Yes, there's something, but not lanes. The left half is shared-use, where bikes need to keep right (center), and pedestrians keep left. There's only a pair of small pictograms towards the sides as a reminder, which doesn't take up the entire "lane". No different surfacing. The right half is a part of the sidewalk.

164848961 4 months ago

It's not possible to add them properly on most if not all such end-user map apps. They are not designed for editing. An `entrance=` needs to be attached to the `building=` directly.

164723207 4 months ago

Tried to divide it into `footway:*=` and `cycleway:*=` , but it doesn't work quite nice. `cycleway*:bicycle:*=` is still needed.

164848961 4 months ago

This is how the default style here shows different `entrance=` , as a small square dot. Other applications would use other icons.

164723207 4 months ago

It's `segregated=no` . There's no `lanes=` for it, nor any visible physical characteristics that would divide it into `*:lanes=` on the left half.

164862842 4 months ago

Please reply to previous changesets from your different accounts. `bus=private` is needed in HK to distinguish franchised bus.

164848961 4 months ago

Already corrected. The `addr:street=` is wrong because you added `addr:housenumber=25` with it, making it 25 Tsuen Wan Market St.

164848961 4 months ago

Please don't upload duplicates to the public database. This functionality is not for private use. The address is wrong as well.

164848701 4 months ago

Please don't delete them directly, as they can contain addresses, and still represent a store space. This makes tracking and updating more difficult. Change it to a plain "point", or "vacant".

164775602 4 months ago

And there's no naming, numbering. or identification for them to qualify as a `=route`

164775602 4 months ago

It's enough to add `*cn=yes`

164775602 4 months ago

It's better to avoid creating these. They aren't really routes, but are groups inside a district. There's no linear routing between a start and end.

164759467 4 months ago

Please don't delete a properly tagged object, especially not replace it with your wrong version. Edit it if you want to change it.

164756048 4 months ago

As mentioned before, please don't add the location to the `name=` , which should be the proper name only without hyphenated or bracketed descriptor labels. `branch=` should be used.

164666053 4 months ago

But also for that matter in OHM, again `natural=peak` is different from the `place=` named after it. You should only add such a `place=` if that's how the residents or government refer to the community. When the mountain is unpopulated, this shouldn't be added.

164666053 4 months ago

You still didn't reply on the original changeset for this…

164666053 4 months ago

You are confusing the terrain with the community. These `place=` are used to refer to settlements, and they need to be how the public are commonly referring to it currently, not to mentioned for addressing purposes.
And again, please don't add historic names especially no-longer-existing features as `name=` + `natural=` / `place=` in OSM. They belong to OpenHistoricalMap. OSM describes the reality now, not what you think it should be.