This is obviously wrong. The road has very visible bridge joints. It's the `tunnel=culvert` that should be corrected.

@Niels Elgaard Larsen
It seems to be a OSMAnd problem. They should not allow creating these if they are unable to attach it to the road. This should be reflected to them.

Again, please read the guidelines before you make such major changes. They exist as they are for a reason. `=trunk` is only used on roads with a `ref=` .

All roads seems already named. The numbering isn't sequential if it is along a street. Likely `addr:place=` and a `place=`
Reports suggest there's no such road https://www.sportsroad.hk/archives/372701/【冷知識】體路之外-香港還有甚麼體育的路？/

Please be careful when moving. There's a dragged point.

5. `destination:street=` is used when the destined road is signposted. This is almost never found in HK.

3. Because of historical legacy, `=motorway` is used for `motorroad=yes` Tunnel Area. However there basically motorway-like Tunnel Area, and those that are not.
4. `name=` are used on `=*_link` as HK designates them as part of the road, and street name signs would be used on them.

1. Please read the guidelines first before you make such disruptive changes. `=trunk` is only used for roads with `ref=` here. osm.wiki/Hong_Kong/Transport/Road#街道分類_Classifications_of_streets
2. Airport Rd is `=motorway` because it only connects with North Lantau Highway

Please don't add bracketed descriptor labels to `name=` , which is for proper names only. Use `description:zh=` , or `loc_name=`

Please don't add the taxonomy to `name=` . Use `species:zh=` etc.

Please don't add the taxonomy to `name=` . Use `species:zh=` etc.

1. Please use descriptive upload comments, and not reuse the same as before. You are mostly editing buildings here.
2. You broken the 3D modeling here. Please study how `building:part=` are used before you touch them. Most `building=` in HK are "wrong" as they are a legacy of older methods.

Removed `name=` , kept `old_name=`

You response makes no sense. This is not a
philosophical discussion. Why is Tan Shan Teng mentioned by it?
You didn't answer how to tell their exact position. If this is the most accurate you can get, it's not accurate enough.

Yeah, your claim immediately fails here osm.org/node/12735511795/history/1

No, it's not the same. No one calls it that now.

Even it's true historically, reminder again `name=` is what's commonly used by the public now. Please add historical names to OHM.

Text alone can't prove anything. You can't tell what's where, especially with how much the terrain has been altered here. The date describe is unknown. Their source is also not given. Heights are missing as well.

This is already clearly indicating it's for a `demolished:place=hamlet`

Can you please stop adding random `place=` ?